Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Ogheneochuko Onajomo

NGR · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

0.8 APGCreation · 45th event percentile

1.5 stocksDefensive activity · 40th event percentile

53.2
HESI v2.1: #68
of 142: 48%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #68 of 142 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

53.2

Event performance

53rd event percentile

54.0

Prospect index

52nd event percentile

ORtg

51.8

Points / 100 poss.

42nd event percentile

DRtg

53.7

Lower is better

81st event percentile

NRtg

-1.8

Two-way margin

53rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 51.8 · 42nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 53.7 · Stop% 89.8% · Team DRtg 62.0

Sample context

6 games · 56 minutes · 48% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

0.8 APG45th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks40th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

53.2

53rd event percentile

Prospect index

54.0

52nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

51.8

42nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

53.7

81st event percentile

Two-way margin

-1.8

53rd event percentile

Stop percentage

89.8%

92nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.8 PPG

38th event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

2.2 RPG

34th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

25.6% TS

29th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P86
Defensive Impact
53.7 DRtg · 90% Stop% · 86th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 53rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 51.8 ORtg and 53.7 DRtg, producing a -1.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, rebounding, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

Defensive stops
89.8% Stop%
92nd event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
53.7 DRtg
81st event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
25.6% TS
29th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
34th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Scoring load
2.8 PPG
38th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

51.8

42nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.8 PPG

38th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

25.6%

29th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

24.1%

34th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

22.2%

35th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

14.3%

context

1.2 attempts per game

Free throws

28.6%

19th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

26.2%

45th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

53.7

81st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+8.3

95th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

89.8%

92nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.5 STL+BLK

40th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

22.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-1.8

53rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-5.3

53rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

53.2

53rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

54.0

52nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-2.6%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.2 RPG

34th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

56.2

context

9.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

48.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#68

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

543.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.8

APG

#68

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#68/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.8

APG

1.5

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

26%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.8

P38

Playmaking

0.8

P45

Rebounding

2.2

P34

True shooting

26%

P29

Two-way impact

-1.8

P53

Stops

90%

P92

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

22%

6 made / 27 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

Free throws

29%

4 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

●2PA 20●3PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.8 / game

6–27

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

4–14

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.8 / game

TOV

1.5 / game

0.56×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.2 / game

OREB

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

STL

1.5 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

53.2

HESI

54.0

51.8

ORtg

53.7

DRtg

-1.8

NRtg

-5.3

Stable NRtg

90%

Stop%

26%

Floor%

24%

eFG%

-3%

PIE

62.0

Team DRtg

+8.3

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #67Bisola ArowoloNigeria

//current_rank

#68

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #69BERETE KANTECôte d'Ivoire

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

2.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.8

APG

1.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

14%

3P%

26%

TS%

event_stats