ORtg
52.8
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Small Forward · SEN · b. 2008
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
8.8 RPGRebounding · 93rd event percentile
4.8 PPGScoring load · 61st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #66 of 142 · Established
HESI
54.6
Event performance
55th event percentile
PI
55.2
Prospect index
54th event percentile
ORtg
52.8
Points / 100 poss.
45th event percentile
DRtg
55.1
Lower is better
79th event percentile
NRtg
-2.3
Two-way margin
52nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 52.8 · 45th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 55.1 · Stop% 76.5% · Team DRtg 56.9
Sample context
5 games · 133 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
54.6
55th event percentile
Prospect index
55.2
54th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
52.8
45th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
55.1
79th event percentile
Two-way margin
-2.3
52nd event percentile
Stop percentage
76.5%
80th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
4.8 PPG
61st event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
60th event percentile
Rebounding
8.8 RPG
93rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.4 stocks
55th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
27.6% TS
38th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
8.8 RPG · 93rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.8 ORtg and 55.1 DRtg, producing a -2.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.
Rebounding
8.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
76.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
55.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
27.6% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
52.8
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
4.8 PPG
61st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
27.6%
38th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.9%
40th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
23.1%
39th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
18.8%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
30.0%
21st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.3%
40th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
60th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
55.1
79th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.8
79th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
76.5%
80th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.4 STL+BLK
55th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
43.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-2.3
52nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-4.3
55th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
54.6
55th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
55.2
54th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.9%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.8 RPG
93rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
133.0
context26.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#66
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
425.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
4.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.2
APG
#66
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
4.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.2
APG
2.6
TOV/G
0.6
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.8
P61
Playmaking
1.2
P60
Rebounding
8.8
P93
True shooting
28%
P38
Two-way impact
-2.3
P52
Stops
77%
P80
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
23%
9 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
3 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
24
PTS
4.8 / game
9–39
FGM–FGA
3–16
3PM–3PA
3–10
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.2 / game
13
TOV
2.6 / game
0.46×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
44
REB
8.8 / game
14
OREB
30
DREB
8.8
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
14
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
54.6
HESI
55.2
PI
52.8
ORtg
55.1
DRtg
-2.3
NRtg
-4.3
Stable NRtg
77%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
6%
PIE
56.9
Team DRtg
+1.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#66
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
4.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.2
APG
1.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
19%
3P%
28%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #66
//quick_read
4.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.2
APG
2.6
TOV/G
0.6
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.8
P61
Playmaking
1.2
P60
Rebounding
8.8
P93
True shooting
28%
P38
Two-way impact
-2.3
P52
Stops
77%
P80
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
23%
9 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
3 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
24
PTS
4.8 / game
9–39
FGM–FGA
3–16
3PM–3PA
3–10
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.2 / game
13
TOV
2.6 / game
0.46×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
44
REB
8.8 / game
14
OREB
30
DREB
8.8
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
14
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
54.6
HESI
55.2
PI
52.8
ORtg
55.1
DRtg
-2.3
NRtg
-4.3
Stable NRtg
77%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
6%
PIE
56.9
Team DRtg
+1.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.