ORtg
72.0
67th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Yara Depaepe
Combo Guard · TUN · b. 2009
//measurables
168 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
44.2% TSScoring efficiency · 84th event percentile
3.3 PPGScoring load · 45th event percentile
- 53.9
- HESI v2.1
- #65
- of 142
- 51%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #65 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
53.9
Event performance
54th event percentile
PI
55.8
Prospect index
55th event percentile
ORtg
72.0
Points / 100 poss.
67th event percentile
DRtg
72.3
Lower is better
27th event percentile
NRtg
-0.2
Two-way margin
54th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 72.0 · 67th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 72.3 · Stop% 45.3% · Team DRtg 62.1
Sample context
6 games · 62 minutes · 51% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS84th event percentile
Scoring load
3.3 PPG45th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
53.9
54th event percentile
Prospect index
55.8
55th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
72.0
67th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
72.3
27th event percentile
Two-way margin
-0.2
54th event percentile
Stop percentage
45.3%
8th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.3 PPG
45th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
37th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
15th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
23rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS
84th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 54th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 72.0 ORtg and 72.3 DRtg, producing a -0.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 67th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
72.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 8th event percentile
Defensive stops
45.3% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 15th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.3 PPG
45th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.2%
84th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.0%
83rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.0%
60th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context2.7 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
80th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.8%
57th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
37th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
72.3
27th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-10.1
9th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
45.3%
8th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
23rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
11.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-0.2
54th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-4.3
54th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
53.9
54th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
55.8
55th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.6%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
15th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
62.1
context10.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
50.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#65
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
505.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
3.3
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.7
APG
#65
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#65/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.3
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.7
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.3
P45
Playmaking
0.7
P37
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
44%
P84
Two-way impact
-0.2
P54
Stops
45%
P8
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
6 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
4 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
80% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
3.3 / game
6–20
FGM–FGA
4–16
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.0 / game
4
OREB
2
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53.9
HESI
55.8
PI
72.0
ORtg
72.3
DRtg
-0.2
NRtg
-4.3
Stable NRtg
45%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
2%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-10.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#15/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.5
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.8
APG
1.5
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.5
P82
Playmaking
1.8
P58
Rebounding
2.0
P8
True shooting
42%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
16 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
26%
7 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
3 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
59% of attempts from three
●2PA 19●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
42
PTS
10.5 / game
16–46
FGM–FGA
7–27
3PM–3PA
3–9
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
6
TOV
1.5 / game
1.17×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
8
REB
2.0 / game
6
OREB
2
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42%
eFG%
3%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #64Malk ElazabEgyptrank_below · #66Céline Hortense GomisSF · Senegal
//current_rank
#65
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#63
Guard · Senegal
8.0 PPG 5.0 RPG 4.8 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#64
#66
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.3
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.7
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
25%
3P%
44%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #65
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.3
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.7
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.3
P45
Playmaking
0.7
P37
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
44%
P84
Two-way impact
-0.2
P54
Stops
45%
P8
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
6 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
4 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
80% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
3.3 / game
6–20
FGM–FGA
4–16
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.0 / game
4
OREB
2
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53.9
HESI
55.8
PI
72.0
ORtg
72.3
DRtg
-0.2
NRtg
-4.3
Stable NRtg
45%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
2%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-10.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #15
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.5
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.8
APG
1.5
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.5
P82
Playmaking
1.8
P58
Rebounding
2.0
P8
True shooting
42%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
16 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
26%
7 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
3 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
59% of attempts from three
●2PA 19●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
42
PTS
10.5 / game
16–46
FGM–FGA
7–27
3PM–3PA
3–9
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
6
TOV
1.5 / game
1.17×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
8
REB
2.0 / game
6
OREB
2
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42%
eFG%
3%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.