Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Fatou Toure Seck

Combo Guard · SEN · b. 2008

//measurables

172 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

4.8 APGCreation · 98th event percentile

8.0 PPGScoring load · 80th event percentile

56.7
HESI v2.1: #63
of 142: 72%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #63 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

56.7

Event performance

57th event percentile

56.9

Prospect index

56th event percentile

ORtg

58.7

Points / 100 poss.

52nd event percentile

DRtg

58.5

Lower is better

71st event percentile

NRtg

+0.2

Two-way margin

55th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 58.7 · 52nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 58.5 · Stop% 68.2% · Team DRtg 56.9

Sample context

5 games · 156 minutes · 72% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.8 APG98th event percentile

Scoring load

8.0 PPG80th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

56.7

57th event percentile

Prospect index

56.9

56th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

58.7

52nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

58.5

71st event percentile

Two-way margin

+0.2

55th event percentile

Stop percentage

68.2%

62nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.0 PPG

80th event percentile

Creation

4.8 APG

98th event percentile

Rebounding

5.0 RPG

71st event percentile

Defensive activity

3.0 stocks

54th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

30.3% TS

43rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P98
Creator
4.8 APG · 98th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 57th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 58.7 ORtg and 58.5 DRtg, producing a +0.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Creation
4.8 APG
98th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
8.0 PPG
80th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive efficiency
58.5 DRtg
71st event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

58.7

52nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.0 PPG

80th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

30.3%

43rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

28.0%

45th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

25.4%

44th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

17.6%

context

3.4 attempts per game

Free throws

43.8%

35th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

28.0%

50th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.8 APG

98th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

58.5

71st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

56.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.6

49th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

68.2%

62nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.0 STL+BLK

54th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

45.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+0.2

55th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-2.2

57th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

56.7

57th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

56.9

56th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

9.7%

71st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.0 RPG

71st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

155.8

context

31.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

72.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#63

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

425.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

8.0

PPG

5.0

RPG

4.8

APG

#63

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#63/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.0

PPG

5.0

RPG

4.8

APG

4.4

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.0

P80

Playmaking

4.8

P98

Rebounding

5.0

P71

True shooting

30%

P43

Two-way impact

+0.2

P55

Stops

68%

P62

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

25%

15 made / 59 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

3 made / 17 attempts

Free throws

44%

7 made / 16 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

●2PA 42●3PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

8.0 / game

15–59

FGM–FGA

3–17

3PM–3PA

7–16

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

4.8 / game

TOV

4.4 / game

1.09×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

5.0 / game

OREB

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

STL

3.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

56.7

HESI

56.9

58.7

ORtg

58.5

DRtg

+0.2

NRtg

-2.2

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

28%

Floor%

28%

eFG%

10%

PIE

56.9

Team DRtg

-1.6

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #62Alaa HajjiG · Tunisia

//current_rank

#63

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #64Malk ElazabEgypt

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

8.0

PPG

5.0

RPG

4.8

APG

3.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

18%

3P%

30%

TS%

event_stats