ORtg
67.0
60th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
NGR · b. 2010
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
43.5% TSScoring efficiency · 82nd event percentile
0.3 stocksDefensive activity · 37th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #61 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
55.3
Event performance
55th event percentile
PI
58.2
Prospect index
57th event percentile
ORtg
67.0
Points / 100 poss.
60th event percentile
DRtg
66.5
Lower is better
43rd event percentile
NRtg
+0.5
Two-way margin
55th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 67.0 · 60th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 66.5 · Stop% 58.0% · Team DRtg 62.0
Sample context
6 games · 55 minutes · 48% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
55.3
55th event percentile
Prospect index
58.2
57th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
67.0
60th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
66.5
43rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+0.5
55th event percentile
Stop percentage
58.0%
26th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
27th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
13th event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
37th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks
37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.5% TS
82nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 67.0 ORtg and 66.5 DRtg, producing a +0.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, defensive stops, and scoring load.
Scoring efficiency
43.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Defensive stops
58.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
67.0
60th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
1.8 PPG
27th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.5%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.0%
83rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.0%
92nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.8%
71st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
13th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
66.5
43rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.6
25th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
58.0%
26th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.3 STL+BLK
37th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
14.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+0.5
55th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-4.2
55th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
55.3
55th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
58.2
57th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.8%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.3 RPG
37th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
54.7
context9.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
47.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#61
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
543.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
1.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.2
APG
#61
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
1.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.2
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.8
P27
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
2.3
P37
True shooting
44%
P82
Two-way impact
+0.5
P55
Stops
58%
P26
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
4 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
1.8 / game
4–10
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.17×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.3 / game
5
OREB
9
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
12
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
55.3
HESI
58.2
PI
67.0
ORtg
66.5
DRtg
+0.5
NRtg
-4.2
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
-4.6
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#61
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
1.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.2
APG
0.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
44%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #61
//quick_read
1.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.2
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.8
P27
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
2.3
P37
True shooting
44%
P82
Two-way impact
+0.5
P55
Stops
58%
P26
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
4 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
1.8 / game
4–10
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
0.17×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.3 / game
5
OREB
9
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
12
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
55.3
HESI
58.2
PI
67.0
ORtg
66.5
DRtg
+0.5
NRtg
-4.2
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
-4.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.