ORtg
89.1
94th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
UGA · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
43.5% TSScoring efficiency · 82nd event percentile
2.2 PPGScoring load · 31st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #59 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
60.3
Event performance
60th event percentile
PI
59.7
Prospect index
59th event percentile
ORtg
89.1
Points / 100 poss.
94th event percentile
DRtg
74.6
Lower is better
21st event percentile
NRtg
+14.5
Two-way margin
71st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 89.1 · 94th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 74.6 · Stop% 43.6% · Team DRtg 64.0
Sample context
5 games · 34 minutes · 36% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
60.3
60th event percentile
Prospect index
59.7
59th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
89.1
94th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.6
21st event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.5
71st event percentile
Stop percentage
43.6%
7th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
2.2 PPG
31st event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
18th event percentile
Rebounding
1.6 RPG
25th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.2 stocks
16th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.5% TS
82nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 60th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.1 ORtg and 74.6 DRtg, producing a +14.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive activity, and creation.
Offensive efficiency
89.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Scoring efficiency
43.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Two-way margin
+14.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Defensive stops
43.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive activity
0.2 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
89.1
94th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
2.2 PPG
31st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.5%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.0%
83rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.0%
60th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
66.7%
context0.6 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
40.3%
86th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
18th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
74.6
21st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
64.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-10.6
7th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
43.6%
7th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.2 STL+BLK
16th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
7.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.5
71st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-0.2
60th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
60.3
60th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
59.7
59th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.0%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.6 RPG
25th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
33.8
context6.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
36.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#59
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
604.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
#59
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
2.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.2
P31
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
1.6
P25
True shooting
44%
P82
Two-way impact
+14.5
P71
Stops
44%
P7
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
67%
2 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
2.2 / game
3–10
FGM–FGA
2–3
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
8
REB
1.6 / game
6
OREB
2
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
60.3
HESI
59.7
PI
89.1
ORtg
74.6
DRtg
+14.5
NRtg
-0.2
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
0%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
-10.6
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#59
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
2.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
0.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
67%
3P%
44%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #59
//quick_read
2.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.2
P31
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
1.6
P25
True shooting
44%
P82
Two-way impact
+14.5
P71
Stops
44%
P7
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
67%
2 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
2.2 / game
3–10
FGM–FGA
2–3
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
8
REB
1.6 / game
6
OREB
2
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
60.3
HESI
59.7
PI
89.1
ORtg
74.6
DRtg
+14.5
NRtg
-0.2
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
0%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
-10.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.