ORtg
69.7
64th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
BEN · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
20.8 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile
11.3 RPGRebounding · 97th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #57 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
61.7
Event performance
62nd event percentile
PI
60.9
Prospect index
60th event percentile
ORtg
69.7
Points / 100 poss.
64th event percentile
DRtg
64.2
Lower is better
48th event percentile
NRtg
+5.5
Two-way margin
59th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 69.7 · 64th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 64.2 · Stop% 99.9% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 113 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Rebounding
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
61.7
62nd event percentile
Prospect index
60.9
60th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.7
64th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
64.2
48th event percentile
Two-way margin
+5.5
59th event percentile
Stop percentage
99.9%
98th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
20.8 PPG
99th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
62nd event percentile
Rebounding
11.3 RPG
97th event percentile
Defensive activity
6.8 stocks
97th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.7% TS
65th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
20.8 PPG · 100th event percentile
Rim Protection
2.8 BPG · 99th event percentile
Rebounder
11.3 RPG · 97th event percentile
Activity
11.3 RPG + 6.8 defensive plays/G · 97th event percentile
Disruptor
6.8 steals + blocks per game · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 62nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 69.7 ORtg and 64.2 DRtg, producing a +5.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive stops, and rebounding.
Scoring load
20.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive stops
99.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Rebounding
11.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
69.7
64th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
20.8 PPG
99th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.7%
65th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
24.4%
35th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
22.5%
37th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context4.5 attempts per game
Free throws
71.0%
83rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.3%
69th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
62nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
64.2
48th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+16.0
99th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
99.9%
98th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
6.8 STL+BLK
97th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
57.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+5.5
59th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+0.6
62nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
61.7
62nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
60.9
60th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.7%
79th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
11.3 RPG
97th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
113.3
context28.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#57
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
20.8
PPG
11.3
RPG
1.3
APG
#57
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#1
RANK
20
FIELD
100%
PERCENTILE
35.0
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
20.8
PPG
11.3
RPG
1.3
APG
8.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
20.8
P100
Playmaking
1.3
P62
Rebounding
11.3
P97
True shooting
39%
P65
Two-way impact
+5.5
P59
Stops
100%
P98
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
23%
18 made / 80 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
3 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
44 made / 62 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
83
PTS
20.8 / game
18–80
FGM–FGA
3–18
3PM–3PA
44–62
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
34
TOV
8.5 / game
0.15×
AST:TOV
39
FD
rebounding
45
REB
11.3 / game
8
OREB
37
DREB
11.3
REB/G
defense
16
STL
4.0 / game
11
BLK
2.8 / game
17
PF
27
STL+BLK
6.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
61.7
HESI
60.9
PI
69.7
ORtg
64.2
DRtg
+5.5
NRtg
+0.6
Stable NRtg
100%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
24%
eFG%
10%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
+16.0
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
35.0
PPG
13.0
RPG
1.0
APG
14.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
35.0
P98
Playmaking
1.0
P65
Rebounding
13.0
P93
True shooting
39%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
21 made / 69 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
62%
28 made / 45 attempts
Shot selection
7% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
70
PTS
35.0 / game
21–69
FGM–FGA
0–5
3PM–3PA
28–45
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
1.0 / game
28
TOV
14.0 / game
0.07×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
26
REB
13.0 / game
12
OREB
14
DREB
13.0
REB/G
defense
15
STL
7.5 / game
11
BLK
5.5 / game
8
PF
26
STL+BLK
13.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
30%
eFG%
44%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
35.0
PPG
13.0
RPG
1.0
APG
7.5
SPG
5.5
BPG
—
3P%
39%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #57
//quick_read
20.8
PPG
11.3
RPG
1.3
APG
8.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
20.8
P100
Playmaking
1.3
P62
Rebounding
11.3
P97
True shooting
39%
P65
Two-way impact
+5.5
P59
Stops
100%
P98
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
23%
18 made / 80 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
3 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
44 made / 62 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
83
PTS
20.8 / game
18–80
FGM–FGA
3–18
3PM–3PA
44–62
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
34
TOV
8.5 / game
0.15×
AST:TOV
39
FD
rebounding
45
REB
11.3 / game
8
OREB
37
DREB
11.3
REB/G
defense
16
STL
4.0 / game
11
BLK
2.8 / game
17
PF
27
STL+BLK
6.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
61.7
HESI
60.9
PI
69.7
ORtg
64.2
DRtg
+5.5
NRtg
+0.6
Stable NRtg
100%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
24%
eFG%
10%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
+16.0
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 32026
2 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
35.0
PPG
13.0
RPG
1.0
APG
14.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
35.0
P98
Playmaking
1.0
P65
Rebounding
13.0
P93
True shooting
39%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
21 made / 69 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
62%
28 made / 45 attempts
Shot selection
7% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
70
PTS
35.0 / game
21–69
FGM–FGA
0–5
3PM–3PA
28–45
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
1.0 / game
28
TOV
14.0 / game
0.07×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
26
REB
13.0 / game
12
OREB
14
DREB
13.0
REB/G
defense
15
STL
7.5 / game
11
BLK
5.5 / game
8
PF
26
STL+BLK
13.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
30%
eFG%
44%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.