ORtg
54.5
48th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MLI · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
39.3% TSScoring efficiency · 68th event percentile
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 46th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #58 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
58.9
Event performance
59th event percentile
PI
59.8
Prospect index
60th event percentile
ORtg
54.5
Points / 100 poss.
48th event percentile
DRtg
40.3
Lower is better
95th event percentile
NRtg
+14.2
Two-way margin
71st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 54.5 · 48th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 40.3 · Stop% 87.2% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
3 games · 29 minutes · 33% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
58.9
59th event percentile
Prospect index
59.8
60th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
54.5
48th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
40.3
95th event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.2
71st event percentile
Stop percentage
87.2%
90th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
29th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
26th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
31st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
46th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.3% TS
68th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 59th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 54.5 ORtg and 40.3 DRtg, producing a +14.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and rebounding.
Defensive efficiency
40.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
87.2% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
+14.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
54.5
48th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
2.0 PPG
29th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.3%
68th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
20.0%
25th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
20.0%
29th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
80th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
28.1%
51st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
26th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
40.3
95th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.7
84th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
87.2%
90th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
46th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.2
71st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-1.0
59th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
58.9
59th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
59.8
60th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.5%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.0 RPG
31st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
29.4
context9.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
32.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#58
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
2.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.3
APG
#58
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
2.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.0
P29
Playmaking
0.3
P26
Rebounding
2.0
P31
True shooting
39%
P68
Two-way impact
+14.2
P71
Stops
87%
P90
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
6
PTS
2.0 / game
1–5
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
6
TOV
2.0 / game
0.17×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
6
REB
2.0 / game
2
OREB
4
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
6
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
58.9
HESI
59.8
PI
54.5
ORtg
40.3
DRtg
+14.2
NRtg
-1.0
Stable NRtg
87%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
1%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+3.7
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#58
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
2.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.3
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
39%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #58
//quick_read
2.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.0
P29
Playmaking
0.3
P26
Rebounding
2.0
P31
True shooting
39%
P68
Two-way impact
+14.2
P71
Stops
87%
P90
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
6
PTS
2.0 / game
1–5
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
6
TOV
2.0 / game
0.17×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
6
REB
2.0 / game
2
OREB
4
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
6
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
58.9
HESI
59.8
PI
54.5
ORtg
40.3
DRtg
+14.2
NRtg
-1.0
Stable NRtg
87%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
1%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+3.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.