ORtg
67.7
61st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
UGA · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
16.2 PPGScoring load · 97th event percentile
2.8 APGCreation · 89th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #56 of 142 · Established
HESI
62.4
Event performance
62nd event percentile
PI
61.4
Prospect index
61st event percentile
ORtg
67.7
Points / 100 poss.
61st event percentile
DRtg
63.3
Lower is better
51st event percentile
NRtg
+4.4
Two-way margin
58th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 67.7 · 61st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.3 · Stop% 70.9% · Team DRtg 64.0
Sample context
6 games · 183 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Creation
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
62.4
62nd event percentile
Prospect index
61.4
61st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
67.7
61st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.3
51st event percentile
Two-way margin
+4.4
58th event percentile
Stop percentage
70.9%
71st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
16.2 PPG
97th event percentile
Creation
2.8 APG
89th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
71st event percentile
Defensive activity
4.7 stocks
60th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.5% TS
63rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
16.2 PPG · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 62nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 67.7 ORtg and 63.3 DRtg, producing a +4.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and defensive stops.
Scoring load
16.2 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
2.8 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
70.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
67.7
61st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
16.2 PPG
97th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.5%
63rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.0%
57th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.3%
63rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
15.8%
context6.3 attempts per game
Free throws
54.3%
67th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
33.4%
68th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.8 APG
89th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.3
51st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
64.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.7
71st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.9%
71st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.7 STL+BLK
60th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
65.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+4.4
58th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+1.2
62nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
62.4
62nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
61.4
61st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.9%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
71st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
183.2
context30.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
75.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#56
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
604.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
16.2
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.8
APG
#56
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
16.2
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.8
APG
6.2
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
16.2
P97
Playmaking
2.8
P89
Rebounding
5.0
P71
True shooting
38%
P63
Two-way impact
+4.4
P58
Stops
71%
P71
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
33 made / 109 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
16%
6 made / 38 attempts
FT
Free throws
54%
25 made / 46 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
97
PTS
16.2 / game
33–109
FGM–FGA
6–38
3PM–3PA
25–46
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.8 / game
37
TOV
6.2 / game
0.46×
AST:TOV
32
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
12
OREB
18
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
28
STL
4.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
17
PF
28
STL+BLK
4.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
62.4
HESI
61.4
PI
67.7
ORtg
63.3
DRtg
+4.4
NRtg
+1.2
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
4%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
+0.7
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#56
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
16.2
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.8
APG
4.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
16%
3P%
38%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #56
//quick_read
16.2
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.8
APG
6.2
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
16.2
P97
Playmaking
2.8
P89
Rebounding
5.0
P71
True shooting
38%
P63
Two-way impact
+4.4
P58
Stops
71%
P71
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
33 made / 109 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
16%
6 made / 38 attempts
FT
Free throws
54%
25 made / 46 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
97
PTS
16.2 / game
33–109
FGM–FGA
6–38
3PM–3PA
25–46
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.8 / game
37
TOV
6.2 / game
0.46×
AST:TOV
32
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
12
OREB
18
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
28
STL
4.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
17
PF
28
STL+BLK
4.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
62.4
HESI
61.4
PI
67.7
ORtg
63.3
DRtg
+4.4
NRtg
+1.2
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
4%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
+0.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.