ORtg
74.9
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · CMR · b. 2010
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
4.0 PPGScoring load · 56th event percentile
33.5% TSScoring efficiency · 53rd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #54 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
59.6
Event performance
60th event percentile
PI
61.6
Prospect index
62nd event percentile
ORtg
74.9
Points / 100 poss.
74th event percentile
DRtg
68.3
Lower is better
38th event percentile
NRtg
+6.6
Two-way margin
61st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 74.9 · 74th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.3 · Stop% 49.0% · Team DRtg 57.7
Sample context
6 games · 62 minutes · 51% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
59.6
60th event percentile
Prospect index
61.6
62nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
74.9
74th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.3
38th event percentile
Two-way margin
+6.6
61st event percentile
Stop percentage
49.0%
13th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
56th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
26th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
38th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.5% TS
53rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 60th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.9 ORtg and 68.3 DRtg, producing a +6.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Offensive efficiency
74.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Defensive stops
49.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive activity
0.7 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
74.9
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
4.0 PPG
56th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.5%
53rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
27.4%
44th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.8%
45th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
10.0%
context1.7 attempts per game
Free throws
63.6%
77th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.0%
79th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.3
38th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
57.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-10.6
8th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
49.0%
13th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
38th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
13.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+6.6
61st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-0.8
60th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
59.6
60th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
61.6
62nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.8%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
26th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
62.4
context10.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
51.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#54
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
534.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.0
APG
#54
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
4.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.0
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.0
P56
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
1.7
P26
True shooting
34%
P53
Two-way impact
+6.6
P61
Stops
49%
P13
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
26%
8 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
7 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–31
FGM–FGA
1–10
3PM–3PA
7–11
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
8
TOV
1.3 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
6
OREB
4
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
59.6
HESI
61.6
PI
74.9
ORtg
68.3
DRtg
+6.6
NRtg
-0.8
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
1%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-10.6
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#54
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
4.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.0
APG
0.5
SPG
0.2
BPG
10%
3P%
34%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #54
//quick_read
4.0
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.0
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.0
P56
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
1.7
P26
True shooting
34%
P53
Two-way impact
+6.6
P61
Stops
49%
P13
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
26%
8 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
7 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–31
FGM–FGA
1–10
3PM–3PA
7–11
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
8
TOV
1.3 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
6
OREB
4
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
59.6
HESI
61.6
PI
74.9
ORtg
68.3
DRtg
+6.6
NRtg
-0.8
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
1%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-10.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.