back_to_rankings
Mary Hazel Ssengendo portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Mary Hazel Ssengendo

UGA · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalRebounder8.5 RPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity8.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

8.5 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile

9.0 PPGScoring load · 84th event percentile

64.5
HESI v2.1
#52
of 142
76%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #52 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

64.5

Event performance

64th event percentile

PI

63.1

Prospect index

64th event percentile

ORtg

73.9

Points / 100 poss.

71st event percentile

DRtg

68.0

Lower is better

39th event percentile

NRtg

+5.9

Two-way margin

60th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 73.9 · 71st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 68.0 · Stop% 59.6% · Team DRtg 64.0

Sample context

6 games · 190 minutes · 76% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

8.5 RPG92nd event percentile

Scoring load

9.0 PPG84th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

64.5

64th event percentile

Prospect index

63.1

64th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

73.9

71st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

68.0

39th event percentile

Two-way margin

+5.9

60th event percentile

Stop percentage

59.6%

30th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

9.0 PPG

84th event percentile

Creation

2.0 APG

78th event percentile

Rebounding

8.5 RPG

92nd event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

74th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

40.5% TS

73rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P92

    Rebounder

    8.5 RPG · 92nd event percentile

  • P80

    Activity

    8.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 73.9 ORtg and 68.0 DRtg, producing a +5.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Rebounding

    8.5 RPG

    92nd event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  2. Scoring load

    9.0 PPG

    84th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Creation

    2.0 APG

    78th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive stops

    59.6% Stop%

    30th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    68.0 DRtg

    39th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

73.9

71st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

9.0 PPG

84th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

40.5%

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.5%

75th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

36.7%

81st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

16.7%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Free throws

60.0%

75th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.9%

78th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.0 APG

78th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

68.0

39th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

64.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.0

30th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

59.6%

30th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

74th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

57.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+5.9

60th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.4

64th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

64.5

64th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

63.1

64th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

12.6%

93rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

8.5 RPG

92nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

190.1

context

31.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

76.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#52

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

604.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

9.0

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.0

APG

#52

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#52/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.0

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

41%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P84

Playmaking

2.0

P78

Rebounding

8.5

P92

True shooting

41%

P73

Two-way impact

+5.9

P60

Stops

60%

P30

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

37%

22 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

9 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

2PA 543PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

54

PTS

9.0 / game

22–60

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

9–15

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

2.0 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

0.63×

AST:TOV

9

FD

rebounding

51

REB

8.5 / game

18

OREB

33

DREB

8.5

REB/G

defense

10

STL

1.7 / game

4

BLK

0.7 / game

9

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64.5

HESI

63.1

PI

73.9

ORtg

68.0

DRtg

+5.9

NRtg

+2.4

Stable NRtg

60%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

13%

PIE

64.0

Team DRtg

-4.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games190 minutes31.7 min/game76% sample weightrank #52 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Joyce Wangui Kagiri portrait#50

    Joyce Wangui Kagiri

    Kenya

    11.5 PPG 7.3 RPG 1.7 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor4.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.3 RPG + 4.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Brandina Kyalimpa portrait#51

    Brandina Kyalimpa

    Uganda

    2.4 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Menyar Ben Rabeh portrait#53

    Menyar Ben Rabeh

    Forward · Tunisia

    6.2 PPG 4.2 RPG 0.7 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

9.0

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.0

APG

1.7

SPG

0.7

BPG

17%

3P%

41%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #52

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.0

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

41%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P84

Playmaking

2.0

P78

Rebounding

8.5

P92

True shooting

41%

P73

Two-way impact

+5.9

P60

Stops

60%

P30

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

37%

22 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

9 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

2PA 543PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

54

PTS

9.0 / game

22–60

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

9–15

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

2.0 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

0.63×

AST:TOV

9

FD

rebounding

51

REB

8.5 / game

18

OREB

33

DREB

8.5

REB/G

defense

10

STL

1.7 / game

4

BLK

0.7 / game

9

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64.5

HESI

63.1

PI

73.9

ORtg

68.0

DRtg

+5.9

NRtg

+2.4

Stable NRtg

60%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

13%

PIE

64.0

Team DRtg

-4.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games190 minutes31.7 min/game76% sample weightrank #52 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.