ORtg
73.9
71st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
UGA · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
8.5 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
9.0 PPGScoring load · 84th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #52 of 142 · Established
HESI
64.5
Event performance
64th event percentile
PI
63.1
Prospect index
64th event percentile
ORtg
73.9
Points / 100 poss.
71st event percentile
DRtg
68.0
Lower is better
39th event percentile
NRtg
+5.9
Two-way margin
60th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 73.9 · 71st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.0 · Stop% 59.6% · Team DRtg 64.0
Sample context
6 games · 190 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
64.5
64th event percentile
Prospect index
63.1
64th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
73.9
71st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.0
39th event percentile
Two-way margin
+5.9
60th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.6%
30th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
9.0 PPG
84th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
78th event percentile
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
74th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
40.5% TS
73rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
8.5 RPG · 92nd event percentile
Activity
8.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 73.9 ORtg and 68.0 DRtg, producing a +5.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
9.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
59.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
68.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
73.9
71st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
9.0 PPG
84th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
40.5%
73rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.5%
75th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.7%
81st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
60.0%
75th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.9%
78th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
78th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.0
39th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
64.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.0
30th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.6%
30th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
74th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
57.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+5.9
60th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.4
64th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
64.5
64th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
63.1
64th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.6%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.5 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
190.1
context31.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
76.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#52
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
604.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.0
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.0
APG
#52
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
9.0
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.0
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
41%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.0
P84
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
8.5
P92
True shooting
41%
P73
Two-way impact
+5.9
P60
Stops
60%
P30
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
22 made / 60 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
9 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
54
PTS
9.0 / game
22–60
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
9–15
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
0.63×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
51
REB
8.5 / game
18
OREB
33
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
64.5
HESI
63.1
PI
73.9
ORtg
68.0
DRtg
+5.9
NRtg
+2.4
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
13%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
-4.0
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#52
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.0
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.0
APG
1.7
SPG
0.7
BPG
17%
3P%
41%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #52
//quick_read
9.0
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.0
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
41%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.0
P84
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
8.5
P92
True shooting
41%
P73
Two-way impact
+5.9
P60
Stops
60%
P30
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
22 made / 60 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
9 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
54
PTS
9.0 / game
22–60
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
9–15
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
0.63×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
51
REB
8.5 / game
18
OREB
33
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
64.5
HESI
63.1
PI
73.9
ORtg
68.0
DRtg
+5.9
NRtg
+2.4
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
13%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
-4.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.