ORtg
79.2
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
UGA · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
37.0% TSScoring efficiency · 60th event percentile
1.2 stocksDefensive activity · 36th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #51 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
63.1
Event performance
63rd event percentile
PI
63.2
Prospect index
64th event percentile
ORtg
79.2
Points / 100 poss.
81st event percentile
DRtg
57.8
Lower is better
73rd event percentile
NRtg
+21.4
Two-way margin
79th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 79.2 · 81st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 57.8 · Stop% 84.0% · Team DRtg 64.0
Sample context
5 games · 30 minutes · 33% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
63.1
63rd event percentile
Prospect index
63.2
64th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.2
81st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
57.8
73rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+21.4
79th event percentile
Stop percentage
84.0%
88th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
2.4 PPG
34th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
15th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
36th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.0% TS
60th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 63rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.2 ORtg and 57.8 DRtg, producing a +21.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are creation, rebounding, and scoring load.
Defensive stops
84.0% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Offensive efficiency
79.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+21.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Scoring load
2.4 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
79.2
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
2.4 PPG
34th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.0%
60th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
28.6%
48th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
21.4%
33rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
80.0%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
32.9%
67th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
57.8
73rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
64.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.2
92nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
84.0%
88th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
36th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+21.4
79th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+1.4
63rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
63.1
63rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
63.2
64th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.7%
59th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
15th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
29.8
context6.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
33.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#51
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
604.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.4
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
#51
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
2.4
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.4
P34
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
37%
P60
Two-way impact
+21.4
P79
Stops
84%
P88
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
21%
3 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
4 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
12
PTS
2.4 / game
3–14
FGM–FGA
2–10
3PM–3PA
4–5
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.0 / game
1
OREB
4
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
63.1
HESI
63.2
PI
79.2
ORtg
57.8
DRtg
+21.4
NRtg
+1.4
Stable NRtg
84%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
2%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
+6.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#51
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
2.4
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
1.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
20%
3P%
37%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #51
//quick_read
2.4
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.4
P34
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
37%
P60
Two-way impact
+21.4
P79
Stops
84%
P88
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
21%
3 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
4 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
12
PTS
2.4 / game
3–14
FGM–FGA
2–10
3PM–3PA
4–5
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.0 / game
1
OREB
4
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
63.1
HESI
63.2
PI
79.2
ORtg
57.8
DRtg
+21.4
NRtg
+1.4
Stable NRtg
84%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
2%
PIE
64.0
Team DRtg
+6.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.