ORtg
63.3
58th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
KEN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
11.5 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile
7.3 RPGRebounding · 86th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #50 of 142 · Established
HESI
65.3
Event performance
65th event percentile
PI
63.7
Prospect index
65th event percentile
ORtg
63.3
Points / 100 poss.
58th event percentile
DRtg
55.7
Lower is better
78th event percentile
NRtg
+7.6
Two-way margin
64th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 63.3 · 58th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 55.7 · Stop% 99.4% · Team DRtg 69.2
Sample context
6 games · 128 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Rebounding
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
65.3
65th event percentile
Prospect index
63.7
65th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
63.3
58th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
55.7
78th event percentile
Two-way margin
+7.6
64th event percentile
Stop percentage
99.4%
97th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
11.5 PPG
92nd event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
73rd event percentile
Rebounding
7.3 RPG
86th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.5 stocks
60th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.2% TS
51st event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
11.5 PPG · 92nd event percentile
Defensive Impact
55.7 DRtg · 99% Stop% · 87th event percentile
Rebounder
7.3 RPG · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 65th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 63.3 ORtg and 55.7 DRtg, producing a +7.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, scoring load, and rebounding.
Defensive stops
99.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Scoring load
11.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
7.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
63.3
58th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
11.5 PPG
92nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.2%
51st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.7%
39th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
24.4%
40th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
9.8%
context6.8 attempts per game
Free throws
56.1%
68th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
31.5%
60th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
73rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
55.7
78th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
69.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+13.6
99th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
99.4%
97th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.5 STL+BLK
60th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
61.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+7.6
64th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.5
65th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
65.3
65th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
63.7
65th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.1%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.3 RPG
86th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
128.0
context21.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#50
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
579.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
11.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.7
APG
#50
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
11.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.7
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
5
GP
10.2
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.4
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//current_rank
#50
of 142 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
11.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.7
APG
4.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
10%
3P%
33%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #50
//quick_read
11.5
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.7
APG
4.5
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.5
P92
Playmaking
1.7
P73
Rebounding
7.3
P86
True shooting
33%
P51
Two-way impact
+7.6
P64
Stops
99%
P97
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
24%
21 made / 86 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
4 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
56%
23 made / 41 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
69
PTS
11.5 / game
21–86
FGM–FGA
4–41
3PM–3PA
23–41
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
27
TOV
4.5 / game
0.37×
AST:TOV
30
FD
rebounding
44
REB
7.3 / game
19
OREB
25
DREB
7.3
REB/G
defense
27
STL
4.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
22
PF
27
STL+BLK
4.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
65.3
HESI
63.7
PI
63.3
ORtg
55.7
DRtg
+7.6
NRtg
+2.5
Stable NRtg
99%
Stop%
31%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
3%
PIE
69.2
Team DRtg
+13.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #21
//quick_read
10.2
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.4
APG
4.8
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.2
P81
Playmaking
1.4
P60
Rebounding
5.4
P72
True shooting
38%
P59
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
17 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
21%
6 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
65%
11 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
51
PTS
10.2 / game
17–59
FGM–FGA
6–28
3PM–3PA
11–17
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
24
TOV
4.8 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
27
REB
5.4 / game
10
OREB
17
DREB
5.4
REB/G
defense
21
STL
4.2 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
18
PF
23
STL+BLK
4.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
34%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.