Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Precious Grace Aladelua portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Precious Grace Aladelua

NGR · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

6.8 RPGRebounding · 85th event percentile

1.5 stocksDefensive activity · 58th event percentile

68.8
HESI v2.1
#48
of 142
61%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #48 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

68.8

Event performance

69th event percentile

PI

66.5

Prospect index

67th event percentile

ORtg

67.9

Points / 100 poss.

62nd event percentile

DRtg

57.0

Lower is better

76th event percentile

NRtg

+10.9

Two-way margin

66th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 67.9 · 62nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 57.0 · Stop% 81.5% · Team DRtg 62.0

Sample context

6 games · 96 minutes · 61% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

6.8 RPG85th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks58th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

68.8

69th event percentile

Prospect index

66.5

67th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

67.9

62nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

57.0

76th event percentile

Two-way margin

+10.9

66th event percentile

Stop percentage

81.5%

86th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.7 PPG

36th event percentile

Creation

0.7 APG

37th event percentile

Rebounding

6.8 RPG

85th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks

58th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.2% TS

51st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 69th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 67.9 ORtg and 57.0 DRtg, producing a +10.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring load and creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    81.5% Stop%

    86th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Rebounding

    6.8 RPG

    85th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  3. Defensive efficiency

    57.0 DRtg

    76th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    2.7 PPG

    36th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  2. Creation

    0.7 APG

    37th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

67.9

62nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.7 PPG

36th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

33.2%

51st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

33.3%

60th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

33.3%

72nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.3 attempts per game

Free throws

28.6%

19th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

34.3%

70th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.7 APG

37th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

57.0

76th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+4.9

89th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

81.5%

86th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.5 STL+BLK

58th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

34.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+10.9

66th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+3.4

69th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

68.8

69th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

66.5

67th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

7.5%

82nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.8 RPG

85th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

95.8

context

16.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

61.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#48

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

543.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

2.7

PPG

6.8

RPG

0.7

APG

#48

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#48/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.7

PPG

6.8

RPG

0.7

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

33%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.7

P36

Playmaking

0.7

P37

Rebounding

6.8

P85

True shooting

33%

P51

Two-way impact

+10.9

P66

Stops

82%

P86

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

33%

7 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

FT

Free throws

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

●2PA 19●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

16

PTS

2.7 / game

7–21

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

2–7

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

0.7 / game

8

TOV

1.3 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

41

REB

6.8 / game

16

OREB

25

DREB

6.8

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

2

BLK

0.3 / game

11

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

68.8

HESI

66.5

PI

67.9

ORtg

57.0

DRtg

+10.9

NRtg

+3.4

Stable NRtg

82%

Stop%

34%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

8%

PIE

62.0

Team DRtg

+4.9

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games96 minutes16.0 min/game61% sample weightrank #48 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #47Anouchka MalenguePG · Cameroon

//current_rank

#48

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #49Nimah IbidunniNigeria
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Fatoumata Binetou Sall portrait#46

    Fatoumata Binetou Sall

    Point Guard · Senegal

    8.6 PPG 3.0 RPG 1.4 APG

  • Anouchka Malengue portrait#47

    Anouchka Malengue

    Point Guard · Cameroon

    7.7 PPG 2.0 RPG 2.3 APG

  • Nimah Ibidunni portrait#49

    Nimah Ibidunni

    Nigeria

    6.8 PPG 6.0 RPG 0.5 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

2.7

PPG

6.8

RPG

0.7

APG

1.2

SPG

0.3

BPG

0%

3P%

33%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #48

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.7

PPG

6.8

RPG

0.7

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

33%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.7

P36

Playmaking

0.7

P37

Rebounding

6.8

P85

True shooting

33%

P51

Two-way impact

+10.9

P66

Stops

82%

P86

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

33%

7 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

FT

Free throws

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

●2PA 19●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

16

PTS

2.7 / game

7–21

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

2–7

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

0.7 / game

8

TOV

1.3 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

41

REB

6.8 / game

16

OREB

25

DREB

6.8

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

2

BLK

0.3 / game

11

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

68.8

HESI

66.5

PI

67.9

ORtg

57.0

DRtg

+10.9

NRtg

+3.4

Stable NRtg

82%

Stop%

34%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

8%

PIE

62.0

Team DRtg

+4.9

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games96 minutes16.0 min/game61% sample weightrank #48 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.