back_to_rankings
Anouchka Malengue portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Anouchka Malengue

Point Guard · CMR · b. 2009

//measurables

170 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.3 APGCreation · 83rd event percentile

7.7 PPGScoring load · 79th event percentile

67.4
HESI v2.1
#47
of 142
73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #47 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

67.4

Event performance

67th event percentile

PI

66.6

Prospect index

67th event percentile

ORtg

76.3

Points / 100 poss.

78th event percentile

DRtg

69.3

Lower is better

33rd event percentile

NRtg

+7.0

Two-way margin

62nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 76.3 · 78th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 69.3 · Stop% 46.7% · Team DRtg 57.7

Sample context

6 games · 159 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.3 APG83rd event percentile

Scoring load

7.7 PPG79th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

67.4

67th event percentile

Prospect index

66.6

67th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

76.3

78th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

69.3

33rd event percentile

Two-way margin

+7.0

62nd event percentile

Stop percentage

46.7%

10th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.7 PPG

79th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

83rd event percentile

Rebounding

2.0 RPG

31st event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

54th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

39.2% TS

68th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 67th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.3 ORtg and 69.3 DRtg, producing a +7.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    2.3 APG

    83rd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Scoring load

    7.7 PPG

    79th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Offensive efficiency

    76.3 ORtg

    78th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive stops

    46.7% Stop%

    10th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  2. Rebounding

    2.0 RPG

    31st event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  3. Defensive efficiency

    69.3 DRtg

    33rd event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

76.3

78th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.7 PPG

79th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

39.2%

68th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

35.6%

69th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

32.7%

68th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

14.3%

context

3.5 attempts per game

Free throws

60.0%

75th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.8%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

83rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

69.3

33rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

57.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-11.6

4th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

46.7%

10th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

54th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

32.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+7.0

62nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.8

67th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

67.4

67th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

66.6

67th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.9%

65th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.0 RPG

31st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

159.2

context

26.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

72.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#47

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

534.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

7.7

PPG

2.0

RPG

2.3

APG

#47

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#47/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.7

PPG

2.0

RPG

2.3

APG

3.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.7

P79

Playmaking

2.3

P83

Rebounding

2.0

P31

True shooting

39%

P68

Two-way impact

+7.0

P62

Stops

47%

P10

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

33%

17 made / 52 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

3 made / 21 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

9 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

40% of attempts from three

2PA 313PA 21

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

46

PTS

7.7 / game

17–52

FGM–FGA

3–21

3PM–3PA

9–15

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

18

TOV

3.0 / game

0.78×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

12

REB

2.0 / game

6

OREB

6

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.5 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

7

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

67.4

HESI

66.6

PI

76.3

ORtg

69.3

DRtg

+7.0

NRtg

+2.8

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

4%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

-11.6

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games159 minutes26.5 min/game73% sample weightrank #47 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Edore Pela portrait#45

    Edore Pela

    Nigeria

    6.3 PPG 2.2 RPG 2.2 APG

  • Fatoumata Binetou Sall portrait#46

    Fatoumata Binetou Sall

    Point Guard · Senegal

    8.6 PPG 3.0 RPG 1.4 APG

  • Precious Grace Aladelua portrait#48

    Precious Grace Aladelua

    Nigeria

    2.7 PPG 6.8 RPG 0.7 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

7.7

PPG

2.0

RPG

2.3

APG

1.5

SPG

0.2

BPG

14%

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #47

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.7

PPG

2.0

RPG

2.3

APG

3.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.7

P79

Playmaking

2.3

P83

Rebounding

2.0

P31

True shooting

39%

P68

Two-way impact

+7.0

P62

Stops

47%

P10

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

33%

17 made / 52 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

3 made / 21 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

9 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

40% of attempts from three

2PA 313PA 21

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

46

PTS

7.7 / game

17–52

FGM–FGA

3–21

3PM–3PA

9–15

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

18

TOV

3.0 / game

0.78×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

12

REB

2.0 / game

6

OREB

6

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.5 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

7

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

67.4

HESI

66.6

PI

76.3

ORtg

69.3

DRtg

+7.0

NRtg

+2.8

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

4%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

-11.6

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games159 minutes26.5 min/game73% sample weightrank #47 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.