ORtg
76.3
78th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · CMR · b. 2009
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.3 APGCreation · 83rd event percentile
7.7 PPGScoring load · 79th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #47 of 142 · Established
HESI
67.4
Event performance
67th event percentile
PI
66.6
Prospect index
67th event percentile
ORtg
76.3
Points / 100 poss.
78th event percentile
DRtg
69.3
Lower is better
33rd event percentile
NRtg
+7.0
Two-way margin
62nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 76.3 · 78th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 69.3 · Stop% 46.7% · Team DRtg 57.7
Sample context
6 games · 159 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring load
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
67.4
67th event percentile
Prospect index
66.6
67th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.3
78th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
69.3
33rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+7.0
62nd event percentile
Stop percentage
46.7%
10th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
7.7 PPG
79th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
83rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
31st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
54th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.2% TS
68th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 67th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.3 ORtg and 69.3 DRtg, producing a +7.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive efficiency.
Creation
2.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
7.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
76.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Defensive stops
46.7% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive efficiency
69.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
76.3
78th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
7.7 PPG
79th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.2%
68th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
35.6%
69th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.7%
68th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
14.3%
context3.5 attempts per game
Free throws
60.0%
75th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.8%
76th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
83rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
69.3
33rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
57.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-11.6
4th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
46.7%
10th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
54th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
32.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+7.0
62nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.8
67th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
67.4
67th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
66.6
67th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.9%
65th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.0 RPG
31st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
159.2
context26.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#47
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
534.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
7.7
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.3
APG
#47
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
7.7
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.7
P79
Playmaking
2.3
P83
Rebounding
2.0
P31
True shooting
39%
P68
Two-way impact
+7.0
P62
Stops
47%
P10
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
33%
17 made / 52 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
3 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
9 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
46
PTS
7.7 / game
17–52
FGM–FGA
3–21
3PM–3PA
9–15
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.78×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.0 / game
6
OREB
6
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
7
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
67.4
HESI
66.6
PI
76.3
ORtg
69.3
DRtg
+7.0
NRtg
+2.8
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
4%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-11.6
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#47
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
7.7
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.3
APG
1.5
SPG
0.2
BPG
14%
3P%
39%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #47
//quick_read
7.7
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.7
P79
Playmaking
2.3
P83
Rebounding
2.0
P31
True shooting
39%
P68
Two-way impact
+7.0
P62
Stops
47%
P10
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
33%
17 made / 52 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
3 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
9 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
46
PTS
7.7 / game
17–52
FGM–FGA
3–21
3PM–3PA
9–15
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.78×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.0 / game
6
OREB
6
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
7
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
67.4
HESI
66.6
PI
76.3
ORtg
69.3
DRtg
+7.0
NRtg
+2.8
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
4%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-11.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.