ORtg
71.4
66th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Edore Pela
NGR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.2 APGCreation · 80th event percentile
6.3 PPGScoring load · 75th event percentile
- 68.1
- HESI v2.1
- #45
- of 142
- 67%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #45 of 142 · Established
HESI
68.1
Event performance
68th event percentile
PI
67.2
Prospect index
69th event percentile
ORtg
71.4
Points / 100 poss.
66th event percentile
DRtg
62.1
Lower is better
53rd event percentile
NRtg
+9.3
Two-way margin
64th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 71.4 · 66th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 62.1 · Stop% 69.1% · Team DRtg 62.0
Sample context
6 games · 119 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.2 APG80th event percentile
Scoring load
6.3 PPG75th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
68.1
68th event percentile
Prospect index
67.2
69th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
71.4
66th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
62.1
53rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+9.3
64th event percentile
Stop percentage
69.1%
65th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.3 PPG
75th event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
34th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
49th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.0% TS
66th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 68th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.4 ORtg and 62.1 DRtg, producing a +9.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 75th event percentile
Scoring load
6.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.0% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 34th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.3 PPG
75th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.0%
66th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.2%
73rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
27.7%
52nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
32.1%
context4.7 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
90th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
28.0%
50th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.2 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
62.1
53rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.1
62nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
69.1%
65th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
49th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
36.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+9.3
64th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+3.4
68th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
68.1
68th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.2
69th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.9%
76th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.2 RPG
34th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
119.4
context19.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#45
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
543.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.3
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.2
APG
#45
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#45/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.3
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.3
P75
Playmaking
2.2
P80
Rebounding
2.2
P34
True shooting
39%
P66
Two-way impact
+9.3
P64
Stops
69%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
28%
13 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
9 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 19●3PA 28
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
38
PTS
6.3 / game
13–47
FGM–FGA
9–28
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.87×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
13
REB
2.2 / game
2
OREB
11
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
68.1
HESI
67.2
PI
71.4
ORtg
62.1
DRtg
+9.3
NRtg
+3.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
6%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
-0.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #44Orane Chantal Akila TlemcaniG · Tunisiarank_below · #46Fatoumata Binetou SallPG · Senegal
//current_rank
#45
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#43
#44
Guard · Tunisia
9.0 PPG 3.8 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalShooter37% 3PT on 3.8 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#46
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
6.3
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.2
APG
2.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
32%
3P%
39%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #45
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.3
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.3
P75
Playmaking
2.2
P80
Rebounding
2.2
P34
True shooting
39%
P66
Two-way impact
+9.3
P64
Stops
69%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
28%
13 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
9 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 19●3PA 28
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
38
PTS
6.3 / game
13–47
FGM–FGA
9–28
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.87×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
13
REB
2.2 / game
2
OREB
11
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
68.1
HESI
67.2
PI
71.4
ORtg
62.1
DRtg
+9.3
NRtg
+3.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
6%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
-0.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.