ORtg
76.9
79th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Malak ELHEMALY
Center · EGY · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
- 3
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Ivory Coast U18 · 2026-09-08 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Clipvs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-08 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
- Clipvs vs Benin U18 · 2026-09-08 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-08
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · offensive rebounder · short-roll connector
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · offensive rebounder · short-roll connector. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Finishing, Roll gravity, Short-roll processing.
Now · ForwardNow · BigProjects · ForwardProjects · Big
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Finishing
- · Roll gravity
- · Short-roll processing
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a offensive rebounder. Projects to retain a situational role as a short-roll connector. Projects to retain a situational role as a post / mismatch option.
Defensive assignments
situational low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational post matchup defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational rim protector (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Finishing · Roll gravity
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
4 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D3
NCAA Division III hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive70.2 performance rating · rank 43 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 76.9 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive36.8% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive59.0% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #43 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
70.2
Event performance
70th event percentile
PI
67.7
Prospect index
70th event percentile
ORtg
76.9
Points / 100 poss.
79th event percentile
DRtg
62.1
Lower is better
54th event percentile
NRtg
+14.8
Two-way margin
73rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 76.9 · 79th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 62.1 · Stop% 59.0% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 74 minutes · 55% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
42.7% TS80th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG57th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
70.2
70th event percentile
Prospect index
67.7
70th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.9
79th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
62.1
54th event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.8
73rd event percentile
Stop percentage
59.0%
29th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.3 PPG
45th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
57th event percentile
Rebounding
3.2 RPG
48th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
44th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.7% TS
80th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 70th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.9 ORtg and 62.1 DRtg, producing a +14.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 79th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 73rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.8 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 29th event percentile
Defensive stops
59.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.3 PPG
45th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
42.7%
80th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.2%
64th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.6%
66th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
14.3%
context1.2 attempts per game
Free throws
70.0%
83rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.8%
76th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
57th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
62.1
54th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.4
22nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.0%
29th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
44th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
19.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.8
73rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+4.4
70th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
70.2
70th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.7
70th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.7%
59th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.2 RPG
48th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
74.3
context12.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
55.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#43
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
3.3
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.2
APG
#43
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#43/142Event board →
6
GP
3.3
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.2
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#20/48Event board →
4
GP
6.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #42Malak CHEHIDIG · Tunisiarank_below · #44Orane Chantal Akila TlemcaniG · Tunisia
//current_rank
#43
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#41
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.3
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.2
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
14%
3P%
43%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #43
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.3
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.2
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.3
P45
Playmaking
1.2
P57
Rebounding
3.2
P48
True shooting
43%
P80
Two-way impact
+14.8
P73
Stops
59%
P29
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
6 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
1 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
7 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
3.3 / game
6–19
FGM–FGA
1–7
3PM–3PA
7–10
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.64×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.2 / game
12
OREB
7
DREB
3.2
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
12
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
70.2
HESI
67.7
PI
76.9
ORtg
62.1
DRtg
+14.8
NRtg
+4.4
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
2%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-5.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.0
P60
Playmaking
1.3
P55
Rebounding
3.8
P53
True shooting
45%
P77
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
6 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
85%
11 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
6.0 / game
6–21
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
11–13
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
7
OREB
8
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.0 / game
6
BLK
1.5 / game
4
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
31%
eFG%
3%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.