ORtg
71.9
67th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · TUN · b. 2010
//measurables
168 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
44.6% TSScoring efficiency · 87th event percentile
9.0 PPGScoring load · 84th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #44 of 142 · Established
HESI
66.7
Event performance
67th event percentile
PI
67.2
Prospect index
69th event percentile
ORtg
71.9
Points / 100 poss.
67th event percentile
DRtg
64.7
Lower is better
46th event percentile
NRtg
+7.2
Two-way margin
63rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 71.9 · 67th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 64.7 · Stop% 63.7% · Team DRtg 62.1
Sample context
5 games · 152 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
66.7
67th event percentile
Prospect index
67.2
69th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
71.9
67th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
64.7
46th event percentile
Two-way margin
+7.2
63rd event percentile
Stop percentage
63.7%
40th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
9.0 PPG
84th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
60th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
55th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.8 stocks
52nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.6% TS
87th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Efficiency
45% TS on 9.0 PPG · 87th event percentile
Shooter
37% 3PT on 3.8 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 67th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.9 ORtg and 64.7 DRtg, producing a +7.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, scoring load, and offensive efficiency.
Scoring efficiency
44.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Scoring load
9.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
71.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
71.9
67th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
9.0 PPG
84th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.6%
87th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.6%
93rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.0%
84th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
36.8%
context3.8 attempts per game
Free throws
40.0%
29th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
31.5%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
60th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
64.7
46th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.6
42nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
63.7%
40th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.8 STL+BLK
52nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
40.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+7.2
63rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.7
67th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
66.7
67th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.2
69th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
10.1%
76th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
55th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
151.5
context30.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#44
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
505.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
9.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.2
APG
#44
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#6
RANK
31
FIELD
83%
PERCENTILE
10.3
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
9.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.2
APG
3.4
TOV/G
1.4
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.0
P84
Playmaking
1.2
P60
Rebounding
3.8
P55
True shooting
45%
P87
Two-way impact
+7.2
P63
Stops
64%
P40
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
17 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
4 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
45
PTS
9.0 / game
17–46
FGM–FGA
7–19
3PM–3PA
4–10
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.2 / game
17
TOV
3.4 / game
0.35×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.8 / game
7
OREB
12
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
66.7
HESI
67.2
PI
71.9
ORtg
64.7
DRtg
+7.2
NRtg
+2.7
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
10%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
10.3
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.5
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.3
P77
Playmaking
2.5
P81
Rebounding
3.0
P27
True shooting
51%
P95
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
16 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
2 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
7 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
41
PTS
10.3 / game
16–35
FGM–FGA
2–18
3PM–3PA
7–12
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.5 / game
10
TOV
2.5 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
12
REB
3.0 / game
5
OREB
7
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
49%
eFG%
8%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#44
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
10.3
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.5
APG
1.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
51%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #44
//quick_read
9.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.2
APG
3.4
TOV/G
1.4
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.0
P84
Playmaking
1.2
P60
Rebounding
3.8
P55
True shooting
45%
P87
Two-way impact
+7.2
P63
Stops
64%
P40
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
17 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
4 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
45
PTS
9.0 / game
17–46
FGM–FGA
7–19
3PM–3PA
4–10
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.2 / game
17
TOV
3.4 / game
0.35×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.8 / game
7
OREB
12
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
66.7
HESI
67.2
PI
71.9
ORtg
64.7
DRtg
+7.2
NRtg
+2.7
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
10%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #6
//quick_read
10.3
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.5
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.3
P77
Playmaking
2.5
P81
Rebounding
3.0
P27
True shooting
51%
P95
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
16 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
2 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
7 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
41
PTS
10.3 / game
16–35
FGM–FGA
2–18
3PM–3PA
7–12
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.5 / game
10
TOV
2.5 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
12
REB
3.0 / game
5
OREB
7
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
49%
eFG%
8%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.