back_to_rankings
Orane Chantal Akila Tlemcani portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Orane Chantal Akila Tlemcani

Combo Guard · TUN · b. 2010

//measurables

168 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Efficiency45% TS on 9.0 PPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter37% 3PT on 3.8 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

44.6% TSScoring efficiency · 87th event percentile

9.0 PPGScoring load · 84th event percentile

66.7
HESI v2.1
#44
of 142
72%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #44 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

66.7

Event performance

67th event percentile

PI

67.2

Prospect index

69th event percentile

ORtg

71.9

Points / 100 poss.

67th event percentile

DRtg

64.7

Lower is better

46th event percentile

NRtg

+7.2

Two-way margin

63rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 71.9 · 67th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 64.7 · Stop% 63.7% · Team DRtg 62.1

Sample context

5 games · 152 minutes · 72% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

44.6% TS87th event percentile

Scoring load

9.0 PPG84th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

66.7

67th event percentile

Prospect index

67.2

69th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

71.9

67th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

64.7

46th event percentile

Two-way margin

+7.2

63rd event percentile

Stop percentage

63.7%

40th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

9.0 PPG

84th event percentile

Creation

1.2 APG

60th event percentile

Rebounding

3.8 RPG

55th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.8 stocks

52nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.6% TS

87th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P87

    Event Efficiency

    45% TS on 9.0 PPG · 87th event percentile

  • Shooter

    37% 3PT on 3.8 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 67th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.9 ORtg and 64.7 DRtg, producing a +7.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, scoring load, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring efficiency

    44.6% TS

    87th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  2. Scoring load

    9.0 PPG

    84th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Offensive efficiency

    71.9 ORtg

    67th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

71.9

67th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

9.0 PPG

84th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

44.6%

87th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

44.6%

93rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

37.0%

84th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

36.8%

context

3.8 attempts per game

Free throws

40.0%

29th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

31.5%

62nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.2 APG

60th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

64.7

46th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.6

42nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

63.7%

40th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.8 STL+BLK

52nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

40.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+7.2

63rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.7

67th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

66.7

67th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

67.2

69th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

10.1%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.8 RPG

55th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

151.5

context

30.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

71.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#44

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

505.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

9.0

PPG

3.8

RPG

1.2

APG

#44

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#6

RANK

31

FIELD

83%

PERCENTILE

10.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#44/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

3.8

RPG

1.2

APG

3.4

TOV/G

1.4

3PM/G

45%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P84

Playmaking

1.2

P60

Rebounding

3.8

P55

True shooting

45%

P87

Two-way impact

+7.2

P63

Stops

64%

P40

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

37%

17 made / 46 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

37%

7 made / 19 attempts

FT

Free throws

40%

4 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

2PA 273PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

45

PTS

9.0 / game

17–46

FGM–FGA

7–19

3PM–3PA

4–10

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.2 / game

17

TOV

3.4 / game

0.35×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.8 / game

7

OREB

12

DREB

3.8

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

10

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

66.7

HESI

67.2

PI

71.9

ORtg

64.7

DRtg

+7.2

NRtg

+2.7

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

10%

PIE

62.1

Team DRtg

-2.6

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games152 minutes30.3 min/game72% sample weightrank #44 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.5

APG

2.5

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.3

P77

Playmaking

2.5

P81

Rebounding

3.0

P27

True shooting

51%

P95

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

46%

16 made / 35 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

11%

2 made / 18 attempts

FT

Free throws

58%

7 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

51% of attempts from three

2PA 173PA 18

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

41

PTS

10.3 / game

16–35

FGM–FGA

2–18

3PM–3PA

7–12

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

2.5 / game

10

TOV

2.5 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

FD

rebounding

12

REB

3.0 / game

5

OREB

7

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

3

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

49%

eFG%

8%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #6 of 31
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Malak CHEHIDI portrait#42

    Malak CHEHIDI

    Guard · Tunisia

    10.0 PPG 6.5 RPG 2.8 APG

  • Malak ELHEMALY portrait#43

    Malak ELHEMALY

    Center · Egypt

    3.3 PPG 3.2 RPG 1.2 APG

  • Edore Pela portrait#45

    Edore Pela

    Nigeria

    6.3 PPG 2.2 RPG 2.2 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

10.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.5

APG

1.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

51%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #44

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

3.8

RPG

1.2

APG

3.4

TOV/G

1.4

3PM/G

45%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P84

Playmaking

1.2

P60

Rebounding

3.8

P55

True shooting

45%

P87

Two-way impact

+7.2

P63

Stops

64%

P40

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

37%

17 made / 46 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

37%

7 made / 19 attempts

FT

Free throws

40%

4 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

2PA 273PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

45

PTS

9.0 / game

17–46

FGM–FGA

7–19

3PM–3PA

4–10

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.2 / game

17

TOV

3.4 / game

0.35×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.8 / game

7

OREB

12

DREB

3.8

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

10

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

66.7

HESI

67.2

PI

71.9

ORtg

64.7

DRtg

+7.2

NRtg

+2.7

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

10%

PIE

62.1

Team DRtg

-2.6

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games152 minutes30.3 min/game72% sample weightrank #44 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #6

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.5

APG

2.5

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.3

P77

Playmaking

2.5

P81

Rebounding

3.0

P27

True shooting

51%

P95

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

46%

16 made / 35 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

11%

2 made / 18 attempts

FT

Free throws

58%

7 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

51% of attempts from three

2PA 173PA 18

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

41

PTS

10.3 / game

16–35

FGM–FGA

2–18

3PM–3PA

7–12

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

2.5 / game

10

TOV

2.5 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

FD

rebounding

12

REB

3.0 / game

5

OREB

7

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

3

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

49%

eFG%

8%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #6 of 31

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.