ORtg
61.7
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Sedra Mohamed Helmy Mosaad Shalaby
EGY · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.7 APGCreation · 87th event percentile
42.6% TSScoring efficiency · 79th event percentile
- 58.2
- HESI v2.1
- #60
- of 142
- 66%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #60 of 142 · Established
HESI
58.2
Event performance
58th event percentile
PI
59.2
Prospect index
58th event percentile
ORtg
61.7
Points / 100 poss.
55th event percentile
DRtg
59.5
Lower is better
63rd event percentile
NRtg
+2.2
Two-way margin
57th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 61.7 · 55th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.5 · Stop% 65.2% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 115 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.7 APG87th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.6% TS79th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
58.2
58th event percentile
Prospect index
59.2
58th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
61.7
55th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.5
63rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+2.2
57th event percentile
Stop percentage
65.2%
46th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.3 PPG
59th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
87th event percentile
Rebounding
1.8 RPG
29th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.2 stocks
61st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.6% TS
79th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 58th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 61.7 ORtg and 59.5 DRtg, producing a +2.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 87th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 79th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 29th event percentile
Rebounding
1.8 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.3 PPG
59th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
42.6%
79th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.4%
93rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.0%
84th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.7%
context2.5 attempts per game
Free throws
25.0%
15th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
27.5%
49th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.7 APG
87th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.5
63rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.9
39th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.2%
46th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.2 STL+BLK
61st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
33.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+2.2
57th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-1.5
58th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
58.2
58th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
59.2
58th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.5%
65th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.8 RPG
29th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
115.0
context19.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#60
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs Vs Benin · 2026-09-07 · scout: Ahmed Tareq
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-09-07
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
Projected role requires another viewing
Projected role requires another viewing. No separator is established yet
Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo GuardProjects · Lead Guard
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Offensive translation remains unresolved.
Defensive assignments
Defensive assignments remain unresolved; do not infer them from DRtg.
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive58.2 performance rating · rank 60 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 61.7 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive27.5% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive65.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Complete at least eight applicable trait observations
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.3
PPG
1.8
RPG
2.7
APG
#60
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#11
RANK
48
FIELD
79%
PERCENTILE
7.6
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#60/142Event board →
6
GP
4.3
PPG
1.8
RPG
2.7
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#11/48Event board →
5
GP
7.6
PPG
3.4
RPG
3.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #59SHARIFAH AGABAUgandarank_below · #61Becky LawrenceNigeria
//current_rank
#60
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#58
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
7.6
PPG
3.4
RPG
3.8
APG
1.6
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
45%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #60
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.3
PPG
1.8
RPG
2.7
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.3
P59
Playmaking
2.7
P87
Rebounding
1.8
P29
True shooting
43%
P79
Two-way impact
+2.2
P57
Stops
65%
P46
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
10 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
2 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
56% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
4.3 / game
10–27
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
2–8
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
0.84×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
11
REB
1.8 / game
0
OREB
11
DREB
1.8
REB/G
defense
12
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
10
PF
13
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
58.2
HESI
59.2
PI
61.7
ORtg
59.5
DRtg
+2.2
NRtg
-1.5
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
4%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #11
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.6
PPG
3.4
RPG
3.8
APG
2.4
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.6
P70
Playmaking
3.8
P93
Rebounding
3.4
P49
True shooting
45%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
13 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
7 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
54% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 20
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
38
PTS
7.6 / game
13–37
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
7–11
FTM–FTA
creation
19
AST
3.8 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
1.58×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
3.4 / game
6
OREB
11
DREB
3.4
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42%
eFG%
5%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.