ORtg
69.7
65th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Malk Elazab
EGY · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
41.4% TSScoring efficiency · 76th event percentile
1.0 APGCreation · 51st event percentile
- 56.0
- HESI v2.1
- #64
- of 142
- 53%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #64 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
56.0
Event performance
56th event percentile
PI
56.3
Prospect index
55th event percentile
ORtg
69.7
Points / 100 poss.
65th event percentile
DRtg
67.3
Lower is better
40th event percentile
NRtg
+2.4
Two-way margin
57th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 69.7 · 65th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 67.3 · Stop% 46.2% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
5 games · 67 minutes · 53% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
41.4% TS76th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG51st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
56.0
56th event percentile
Prospect index
56.3
55th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.7
65th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
67.3
40th event percentile
Two-way margin
+2.4
57th event percentile
Stop percentage
46.2%
10th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.6 PPG
48th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
0.6 RPG
7th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
44th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
41.4% TS
76th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 56th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 69.7 ORtg and 67.3 DRtg, producing a +2.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 76th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
41.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 65th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 7th event percentile
Rebounding
0.6 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 10th event percentile
Defensive stops
46.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.6 PPG
48th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
41.4%
76th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.0%
83rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.0%
78th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
31.9%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
67.3
40th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-10.6
7th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
46.2%
10th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
44th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
14.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+2.4
57th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-2.7
56th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
56.0
56th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
56.3
55th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.4%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.6 RPG
7th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
67.4
context13.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
52.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#64
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
3.6
PPG
0.6
RPG
1.0
APG
#64
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#17
RANK
48
FIELD
66%
PERCENTILE
10.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#64/142Event board →
5
GP
3.6
PPG
0.6
RPG
1.0
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#17/48Event board →
5
GP
10.8
PPG
0.6
RPG
1.4
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #63Fatou Toure SeckG · Senegalrank_below · #65Yara DepaepeG · Tunisia
//current_rank
#64
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#62
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
10.8
PPG
0.6
RPG
1.4
APG
1.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
59%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #64
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.6
PPG
0.6
RPG
1.0
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
41%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.6
P48
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
0.6
P7
True shooting
41%
P76
Two-way impact
+2.4
P57
Stops
46%
P10
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
7 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
50% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
18
PTS
3.6 / game
7–20
FGM–FGA
2–10
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
7
TOV
1.4 / game
0.71×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
3
REB
0.6 / game
0
OREB
3
DREB
0.6
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
56.0
HESI
56.3
PI
69.7
ORtg
67.3
DRtg
+2.4
NRtg
-2.7
Stable NRtg
46%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-10.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #17
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
0.6
RPG
1.4
APG
2.4
TOV/G
2.4
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P84
Playmaking
1.4
P60
Rebounding
0.6
P16
True shooting
59%
P97
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
20 made / 45 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
12 made / 33 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
73% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 33
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
54
PTS
10.8 / game
20–45
FGM–FGA
12–33
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.58×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
3
REB
0.6 / game
1
OREB
2
DREB
0.6
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
58%
eFG%
4%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.