Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Olivia Amani Atima

UGA · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

2.5 stocksDefensive activity · 73rd event percentile

5.2 RPGRebounding · 73rd event percentile

43.3
HESI v2.1: #82
of 142: 64%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #82 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

43.3

Event performance

43rd event percentile

46.1

Prospect index

43rd event percentile

ORtg

49.0

Points / 100 poss.

40th event percentile

DRtg

64.0

Lower is better

48th event percentile

NRtg

-15.0

Two-way margin

43rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 49.0 · 40th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 64.0 · Stop% 69.2% · Team DRtg 64.0

Sample context

6 games · 107 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

2.5 stocks73rd event percentile

Rebounding

5.2 RPG73rd event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

43.3

43rd event percentile

Prospect index

46.1

43rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

49.0

40th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

64.0

48th event percentile

Two-way margin

-15.0

43rd event percentile

Stop percentage

69.2%

67th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.3 PPG

45th event percentile

Creation

1.2 APG

57th event percentile

Rebounding

5.2 RPG

73rd event percentile

Defensive activity

2.5 stocks

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

26.9% TS

34th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P95
Rim Protection
1.2 BPG · 95th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 43rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 49.0 ORtg and 64.0 DRtg, producing a -15.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive activity
2.5 steals + blocks/G
73rd event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Rebounding
5.2 RPG
73rd event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
69.2% Stop%
67th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
26.9% TS
34th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
49.0 ORtg
40th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

49.0

40th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.3 PPG

45th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

26.9%

34th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

22.6%

30th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

22.6%

38th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

42.9%

33rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

26.0%

44th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.2 APG

57th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

64.0

48th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

64.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-0.0

63rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

69.2%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.5 STL+BLK

73rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-15.0

43rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-12.7

43rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

43.3

43rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

46.1

43rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.1%

52nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.2 RPG

73rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

106.7

context

17.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

64.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#82

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

604.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.3

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.2

APG

#82

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#82/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.2

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P45

Playmaking

1.2

P57

Rebounding

5.2

P73

True shooting

27%

P34

Two-way impact

-15.0

P43

Stops

69%

P67

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

23%

7 made / 31 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

43%

6 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 31●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.3 / game

7–31

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

6–14

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.2 / game

TOV

2.7 / game

0.44×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

5.2 / game

OREB

DREB

5.2

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

1.2 / game

STL+BLK

2.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

43.3

HESI

46.1

49.0

ORtg

64.0

DRtg

-15.0

NRtg

-12.7

Stable NRtg

69%

Stop%

26%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

PIE

64.0

Team DRtg

-0.0

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #81Sadé OnomoSG · Cameroon

//current_rank

#82

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #83Mame Maty DiopF · Senegal

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.3

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.2

APG

1.3

SPG

1.2

BPG

—

3P%

27%

TS%

event_stats