ORtg
52.9
46th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Ghazal Ayari
Center · TUN · b. 2009
//measurables
195 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
31.7% TSScoring efficiency · 47th event percentile
0.7 stocksDefensive activity · 43rd event percentile
- 44.0
- HESI v2.1
- #80
- of 142
- 44%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #80 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
44.0
Event performance
44th event percentile
PI
47.9
Prospect index
44th event percentile
ORtg
52.9
Points / 100 poss.
46th event percentile
DRtg
67.1
Lower is better
41st event percentile
NRtg
-14.2
Two-way margin
45th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 52.9 · 46th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 67.1 · Stop% 58.0% · Team DRtg 62.1
Sample context
6 games · 47 minutes · 44% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
31.7% TS47th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks43rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
44.0
44th event percentile
Prospect index
47.9
44th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
52.9
46th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
67.1
41st event percentile
Two-way margin
-14.2
45th event percentile
Stop percentage
58.0%
25th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
12th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
13th event percentile
Rebounding
0.7 RPG
9th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
43rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
31.7% TS
47th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 44th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.9 ORtg and 67.1 DRtg, producing a -14.2 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, scoring load, and creation.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 9th event percentile
Rebounding
0.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 12th event percentile
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 13th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.8 PPG
12th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
31.7%
47th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
28.6%
48th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
28.6%
54th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
27.2%
48th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
13th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
67.1
41st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.9
23rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
58.0%
25th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
43rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
11.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-14.2
45th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-11.0
44th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
44.0
44th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
47.9
44th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-3.3%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.7 RPG
9th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
46.7
context7.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
43.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#80
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
505.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
0.8
PPG
0.7
RPG
0.2
APG
#80
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#80/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
0.7
RPG
0.2
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P12
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
0.7
P9
True shooting
32%
P47
Two-way impact
-14.2
P45
Stops
58%
P25
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
5
PTS
0.8 / game
2–7
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
3
TOV
0.5 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
4
REB
0.7 / game
0
OREB
4
DREB
0.7
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
10
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44.0
HESI
47.9
PI
52.9
ORtg
67.1
DRtg
-14.2
NRtg
-11.0
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-4.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#28/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
10%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.5
P5
Playmaking
0.0
P5
Rebounding
3.8
P44
True shooting
10%
P5
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
2
PTS
0.5 / game
1–10
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
1
OREB
14
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
5
BLK
1.3 / game
5
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
10%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #79Grace NakalembeUgandarank_below · #81Sadé OnomoSG · Cameroon
//current_rank
#80
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#78
#79
Uganda
6.0 PPG 5.8 RPG 6.3 APG
//event_signalCreator6.3 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor5.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#81
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
0.8
PPG
0.7
RPG
0.2
APG
0.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
32%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #80
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
0.7
RPG
0.2
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P12
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
0.7
P9
True shooting
32%
P47
Two-way impact
-14.2
P45
Stops
58%
P25
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
5
PTS
0.8 / game
2–7
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
3
TOV
0.5 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
4
REB
0.7 / game
0
OREB
4
DREB
0.7
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
10
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44.0
HESI
47.9
PI
52.9
ORtg
67.1
DRtg
-14.2
NRtg
-11.0
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-4.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #28
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
10%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.5
P5
Playmaking
0.0
P5
Rebounding
3.8
P44
True shooting
10%
P5
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
2
PTS
0.5 / game
1–10
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
1
OREB
14
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
5
BLK
1.3 / game
5
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
10%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.