back_to_rankings
Grace Nakalembe portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Grace Nakalembe

UGA · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

6.3 APGCreation · 99th event percentile

5.8 RPGRebounding · 77th event percentile

46.1
HESI v2.1
#79
of 142
78%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #79 of 142 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

46.1

Event performance

46th event percentile

PI

48.4

Prospect index

45th event percentile

ORtg

52.4

Points / 100 poss.

44th event percentile

DRtg

63.4

Lower is better

50th event percentile

NRtg

-11.0

Two-way margin

48th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 52.4 · 44th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 63.4 · Stop% 70.7% · Team DRtg 64.0

Sample context

6 games · 218 minutes · 78% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

6.3 APG99th event percentile

Rebounding

5.8 RPG77th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

46.1

46th event percentile

Prospect index

48.4

45th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

52.4

44th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

63.4

50th event percentile

Two-way margin

-11.0

48th event percentile

Stop percentage

70.7%

71st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

6.0 PPG

71st event percentile

Creation

6.3 APG

99th event percentile

Rebounding

5.8 RPG

77th event percentile

Defensive activity

5.5 stocks

61st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

27.2% TS

35th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P99

    Creator

    6.3 APG · 99th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 46th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.4 ORtg and 63.4 DRtg, producing a -11.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and scoring load. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    6.3 APG

    99th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Rebounding

    5.8 RPG

    77th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  3. Scoring load

    6.0 PPG

    71st event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring efficiency

    27.2% TS

    35th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

52.4

44th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

6.0 PPG

71st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

27.2%

35th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

21.7%

28th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.0%

29th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

18.2%

context

1.8 attempts per game

Free throws

71.4%

85th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

24.9%

41st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

6.3 APG

99th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

63.4

50th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

64.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.6

71st event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

70.7%

71st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

5.5 STL+BLK

61st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

77.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-11.0

48th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-10.5

46th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

46.1

46th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

48.4

45th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

9.4%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.8 RPG

77th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

218.1

context

36.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

78.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#79

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

604.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

6.0

PPG

5.8

RPG

6.3

APG

#79

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

6.0

PPG

5.8

RPG

6.3

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yvana Bella portrait#77

    Yvana Bella

    Point Guard · Cameroon

    3.0 PPG 3.3 RPG 3.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

6.0

PPG

5.8

RPG

6.3

APG

5.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

18%

3P%

27%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #79

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.0

PPG

5.8

RPG

6.3

APG

6.0

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.0

P71

Playmaking

6.3

P99

Rebounding

5.8

P77

True shooting

27%

P35

Two-way impact

-11.0

P48

Stops

71%

P71

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

12 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

2 made / 11 attempts

FT

Free throws

71%

10 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

18% of attempts from three

●2PA 49●3PA 11

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

36

PTS

6.0 / game

12–60

FGM–FGA

2–11

3PM–3PA

10–14

FTM–FTA

creation

38

AST

6.3 / game

36

TOV

6.0 / game

1.06×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

35

REB

5.8 / game

12

OREB

23

DREB

5.8

REB/G

defense

33

STL

5.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

12

PF

33

STL+BLK

5.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

46.1

HESI

48.4

PI

52.4

ORtg

63.4

DRtg

-11.0

NRtg

-10.5

Stable NRtg

71%

Stop%

25%

Floor%

22%

eFG%

9%

PIE

64.0

Team DRtg

+0.6

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games218 minutes36.4 min/game78% sample weightrank #79 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.