ORtg
47.0
38th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Yvana Bella
Point Guard · CMR · b. 2009
//measurables
167 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator3.0 APG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.0 APGCreation · 91st event percentile
3.3 RPGRebounding · 51st event percentile
- 45.4
- HESI v2.1
- #77
- of 142
- 57%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #77 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
45.4
Event performance
45th event percentile
PI
49.0
Prospect index
46th event percentile
ORtg
47.0
Points / 100 poss.
38th event percentile
DRtg
59.4
Lower is better
65th event percentile
NRtg
-12.4
Two-way margin
47th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 47.0 · 38th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.4 · Stop% 69.5% · Team DRtg 57.7
Sample context
4 games · 80 minutes · 57% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
3.0 APG91st event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG51st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
45.4
45th event percentile
Prospect index
49.0
46th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
47.0
38th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.4
65th event percentile
Two-way margin
-12.4
47th event percentile
Stop percentage
69.5%
68th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.0 PPG
40th event percentile
Creation
3.0 APG
91st event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG
51st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
46th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
24.0% TS
23rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P91
Creator
3.0 APG · 91st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 45th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 47.0 ORtg and 59.4 DRtg, producing a -12.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 91st event percentile
Creation
3.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 68th event percentile
Defensive stops
69.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 65th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 23rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
24.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 38th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
47.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 40th event percentile
Scoring load
3.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.0 PPG
40th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
24.0%
23rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
19.0%
22nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
19.0%
26th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context2.5 attempts per game
Free throws
44.4%
36th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.6%
40th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.0 APG
91st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.4
65th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
57.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.7
48th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
69.5%
68th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
46th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-12.4
47th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-10.7
45th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
45.4
45th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
49.0
46th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.5%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.3 RPG
51st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
79.6
context19.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
57.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#77
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
534.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
#77
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#77/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
24%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.0
P40
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
3.3
P51
True shooting
24%
P23
Two-way impact
-12.4
P47
Stops
70%
P68
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
4 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
3.0 / game
4–21
FGM–FGA
0–10
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
3.0 / game
15
TOV
3.8 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
3
OREB
10
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45.4
HESI
49.0
PI
47.0
ORtg
59.4
DRtg
-12.4
NRtg
-10.7
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-1.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #76Alexandra DjonkouPF · Cameroonrank_below · #78Cecilia Marvelous Aleje SundayNigeria
//current_rank
#77
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#75
#76
#78
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
24%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #77
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
24%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.0
P40
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
3.3
P51
True shooting
24%
P23
Two-way impact
-12.4
P47
Stops
70%
P68
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
4 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
3.0 / game
4–21
FGM–FGA
0–10
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
3.0 / game
15
TOV
3.8 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
3
OREB
10
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45.4
HESI
49.0
PI
47.0
ORtg
59.4
DRtg
-12.4
NRtg
-10.7
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-1.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.