back_to_rankings
Alexandra Djonkou portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Alexandra Djonkou

Power Forward · CMR · b. 2008

//measurables

189 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.6 RPGRebounding · 25th event percentile

0.4 stocksDefensive activity · 21st event percentile

47.5
HESI v2.1
#76
of 142
26%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #76 of 142 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

47.5

Event performance

48th event percentile

PI

49.5

Prospect index

47th event percentile

ORtg

41.6

Points / 100 poss.

31st event percentile

DRtg

56.5

Lower is better

76th event percentile

NRtg

-14.9

Two-way margin

44th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 41.6 · 31st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 56.5 · Stop% 76.0% · Team DRtg 57.7

Sample context

5 games · 21 minutes · 26% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

1.6 RPG25th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks21st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

47.5

48th event percentile

Prospect index

49.5

47th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

41.6

31st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

56.5

76th event percentile

Two-way margin

-14.9

44th event percentile

Stop percentage

76.0%

79th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

0.2 PPG

6th event percentile

Creation

0.2 APG

18th event percentile

Rebounding

1.6 RPG

25th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks

21st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

12.9% TS

8th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 48th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 41.6 ORtg and 56.5 DRtg, producing a -14.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    76.0% Stop%

    79th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    56.5 DRtg

    76th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    0.2 PPG

    6th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    12.9% TS

    8th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

  3. Creation

    0.2 APG

    18th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

41.6

31st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

0.2 PPG

6th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

12.9%

8th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

50.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

22.7%

36th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.2 APG

18th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

56.5

76th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

57.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.1

75th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

76.0%

79th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.4 STL+BLK

21st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

7.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-14.9

44th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-10.2

48th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

47.5

48th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

49.5

47th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.6%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.6 RPG

25th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

21.4

context

4.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

26.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#76

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

534.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

0.2

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.2

APG

#76

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#76/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.2

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.2

APG

0.4

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

13%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.2

P6

Playmaking

0.2

P18

Rebounding

1.6

P25

True shooting

13%

P8

Two-way impact

-14.9

P44

Stops

76%

P79

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

2PA 33PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

1

PTS

0.2 / game

0–3

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.2 / game

2

TOV

0.4 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

1

FD

rebounding

8

REB

1.6 / game

4

OREB

4

DREB

1.6

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

2

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

47.5

HESI

49.5

PI

41.6

ORtg

56.5

DRtg

-14.9

NRtg

-10.2

Stable NRtg

76%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

0%

eFG%

1%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

+1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games21 minutes4.3 min/game26% sample weightrank #76 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Rihanna Mercy Nyalando portrait#74

    Rihanna Mercy Nyalando

    Kenya

    8.3 PPG 7.5 RPG 1.5 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Wejden Barhoumi portrait#75

    Wejden Barhoumi

    Center · Tunisia

    2.2 PPG 2.2 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Yvana Bella portrait#77

    Yvana Bella

    Point Guard · Cameroon

    3.0 PPG 3.3 RPG 3.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

0.2

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.2

APG

0.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

13%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #76

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.2

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.2

APG

0.4

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

13%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.2

P6

Playmaking

0.2

P18

Rebounding

1.6

P25

True shooting

13%

P8

Two-way impact

-14.9

P44

Stops

76%

P79

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

2PA 33PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

1

PTS

0.2 / game

0–3

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.2 / game

2

TOV

0.4 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

1

FD

rebounding

8

REB

1.6 / game

4

OREB

4

DREB

1.6

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

2

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

47.5

HESI

49.5

PI

41.6

ORtg

56.5

DRtg

-14.9

NRtg

-10.2

Stable NRtg

76%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

0%

eFG%

1%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

+1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games21 minutes4.3 min/game26% sample weightrank #76 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.