ORtg
41.6
31st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Power Forward · CMR · b. 2008
//measurables
189 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.6 RPGRebounding · 25th event percentile
0.4 stocksDefensive activity · 21st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #76 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
47.5
Event performance
48th event percentile
PI
49.5
Prospect index
47th event percentile
ORtg
41.6
Points / 100 poss.
31st event percentile
DRtg
56.5
Lower is better
76th event percentile
NRtg
-14.9
Two-way margin
44th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 41.6 · 31st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 56.5 · Stop% 76.0% · Team DRtg 57.7
Sample context
5 games · 21 minutes · 26% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
47.5
48th event percentile
Prospect index
49.5
47th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.6
31st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
56.5
76th event percentile
Two-way margin
-14.9
44th event percentile
Stop percentage
76.0%
79th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
0.2 PPG
6th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
18th event percentile
Rebounding
1.6 RPG
25th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks
21st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
12.9% TS
8th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 48th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 41.6 ORtg and 56.5 DRtg, producing a -14.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and creation.
Defensive stops
76.0% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
56.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Scoring load
0.2 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Scoring efficiency
12.9% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
41.6
31st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
0.2 PPG
6th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
12.9%
8th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
0.0%
3rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
0.0%
3rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
22.7%
36th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
18th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
56.5
76th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
57.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.1
75th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
76.0%
79th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.4 STL+BLK
21st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
7.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-14.9
44th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-10.2
48th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
47.5
48th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
49.5
47th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.6%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.6 RPG
25th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
21.4
context4.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
26.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#76
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
534.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
0.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
#76
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
0.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
13%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
0.2
P6
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
1.6
P25
True shooting
13%
P8
Two-way impact
-14.9
P44
Stops
76%
P79
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
1
PTS
0.2 / game
0–3
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
8
REB
1.6 / game
4
OREB
4
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
47.5
HESI
49.5
PI
41.6
ORtg
56.5
DRtg
-14.9
NRtg
-10.2
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
23%
Floor%
0%
eFG%
1%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#76
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
0.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
0.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
13%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #76
//quick_read
0.2
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.2
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
13%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
0.2
P6
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
1.6
P25
True shooting
13%
P8
Two-way impact
-14.9
P44
Stops
76%
P79
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
1
PTS
0.2 / game
0–3
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
8
REB
1.6 / game
4
OREB
4
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
47.5
HESI
49.5
PI
41.6
ORtg
56.5
DRtg
-14.9
NRtg
-10.2
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
23%
Floor%
0%
eFG%
1%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.