ORtg
82.2
83rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · CMR · b. 2009
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
14.2 RPGRebounding · 98th event percentile
3.0 APGCreation · 91st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #12 of 142 · Established
HESI
92.2
Event performance
92nd event percentile
PI
86.5
Prospect index
92nd event percentile
ORtg
82.2
Points / 100 poss.
83rd event percentile
DRtg
51.9
Lower is better
81st event percentile
NRtg
+30.4
Two-way margin
86th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 82.2 · 83rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 51.9 · Stop% 86.8% · Team DRtg 57.7
Sample context
6 games · 188 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Creation
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
92.2
92nd event percentile
Prospect index
86.5
92nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
82.2
83rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
51.9
81st event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.4
86th event percentile
Stop percentage
86.8%
89th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
9.8 PPG
86th event percentile
Creation
3.0 APG
91st event percentile
Rebounding
14.2 RPG
98th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.0 stocks
88th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.3% TS
52nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
14.2 RPG · 98th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile
Activity
14.2 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/G · 91st event percentile
Creator
3.0 APG · 91st event percentile
Event Impact
92.2 HESI performance · 89th event percentile
Disruptor
4.0 steals + blocks per game · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 92nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.2 ORtg and 51.9 DRtg, producing a +30.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, creation, and defensive stops.
Rebounding
14.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Creation
3.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
86.8% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
82.2
83rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
9.8 PPG
86th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.3%
52nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
32.1%
55th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.1%
67th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.2 attempts per game
Free throws
41.2%
30th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.2%
89th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.0 APG
91st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
51.9
81st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
57.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.8
91st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
86.8%
89th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.0 STL+BLK
88th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
71.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+30.4
86th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+20.9
92nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
92.2
92nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
86.5
92nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
23.5%
98th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
14.2 RPG
98th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
187.7
context31.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
75.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#12
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
534.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.8
PPG
14.2
RPG
3.0
APG
#12
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
9.8
PPG
14.2
RPG
3.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.8
P86
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
14.2
P98
True shooting
33%
P52
Two-way impact
+30.4
P86
Stops
87%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
32%
26 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
41%
7 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
1% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
59
PTS
9.8 / game
26–81
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
7–17
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
3.0 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
1.29×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
85
REB
14.2 / game
37
OREB
48
DREB
14.2
REB/G
defense
18
STL
3.0 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
9
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
92.2
HESI
86.5
PI
82.2
ORtg
51.9
DRtg
+30.4
NRtg
+20.9
Stable NRtg
87%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
24%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
+5.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#12
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.8
PPG
14.2
RPG
3.0
APG
3.0
SPG
1.0
BPG
0%
3P%
33%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #12
//quick_read
9.8
PPG
14.2
RPG
3.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.8
P86
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
14.2
P98
True shooting
33%
P52
Two-way impact
+30.4
P86
Stops
87%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
32%
26 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
41%
7 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
1% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
59
PTS
9.8 / game
26–81
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
7–17
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
3.0 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
1.29×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
85
REB
14.2 / game
37
OREB
48
DREB
14.2
REB/G
defense
18
STL
3.0 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
9
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
92.2
HESI
86.5
PI
82.2
ORtg
51.9
DRtg
+30.4
NRtg
+20.9
Stable NRtg
87%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
24%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
+5.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.