ORtg
43.9
10th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
165 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.1 APGCreation · 49th event percentile
1.1 stocksDefensive activity · 45th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #183 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
4.7
Event performance
5th event percentile
PI
18.3
Prospect index
5th event percentile
ORtg
43.9
Points / 100 poss.
10th event percentile
DRtg
98.0
Lower is better
10th event percentile
NRtg
-54.1
Two-way margin
7th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 43.9 · 10th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 98.0 · Stop% 60.7% · Team DRtg 101.1
Sample context
7 games · 94 minutes · 61% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
4.7
5th event percentile
Prospect index
18.3
5th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
43.9
10th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
98.0
10th event percentile
Two-way margin
-54.1
7th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.7%
63rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
1.9 PPG
19th event percentile
Creation
1.1 APG
49th event percentile
Rebounding
1.9 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks
45th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
26.5% TS
17th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 5th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 43.9 ORtg and 98.0 DRtg, producing a -54.1 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, defensive efficiency, and offensive efficiency.
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Two-way margin
-54.1 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Defensive efficiency
98.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Offensive efficiency
43.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
43.9
10th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
1.9 PPG
19th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
26.5%
17th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.2%
21st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
23.8%
23rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
9.1%
context1.6 attempts per game
Free throws
25.0%
11th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
21.3%
12th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.1 APG
49th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
98.0
10th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
101.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.1
84th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.7%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.1 STL+BLK
45th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-54.1
7th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-32.9
5th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
4.7
5th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
18.3
5th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.7%
11th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.9 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
93.9
context13.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
61.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#183
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
589.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
1.9
PPG
1.9
RPG
1.1
APG
#183
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
1.9
PPG
1.9
RPG
1.1
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.9
P19
Playmaking
1.1
P49
Rebounding
1.9
P23
True shooting
27%
P17
Two-way impact
-54.1
P7
Stops
61%
P63
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
24%
5 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
2 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
13
PTS
1.9 / game
5–21
FGM–FGA
1–11
3PM–3PA
2–8
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.1 / game
11
TOV
1.6 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
13
REB
1.9 / game
0
OREB
13
DREB
1.9
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.1 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
4.7
HESI
18.3
PI
43.9
ORtg
98.0
DRtg
-54.1
NRtg
-32.9
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
21%
Floor%
26%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+3.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
1.9
PPG
1.9
RPG
1.1
APG
1.1
SPG
0.0
BPG
9%
3P%
27%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #183
//quick_read
1.9
PPG
1.9
RPG
1.1
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.9
P19
Playmaking
1.1
P49
Rebounding
1.9
P23
True shooting
27%
P17
Two-way impact
-54.1
P7
Stops
61%
P63
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
24%
5 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
2 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
13
PTS
1.9 / game
5–21
FGM–FGA
1–11
3PM–3PA
2–8
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.1 / game
11
TOV
1.6 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
13
REB
1.9 / game
0
OREB
13
DREB
1.9
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.1 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
4.7
HESI
18.3
PI
43.9
ORtg
98.0
DRtg
-54.1
NRtg
-32.9
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
21%
Floor%
26%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+3.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.