ORtg
89.0
93rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Ami Setou Kantao
MLI · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 APGCreation · 78th event percentile
3.0 stocksDefensive activity · 54th event percentile
- 80.1
- HESI v2.1
- #29
- of 142
- 28%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #29 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
80.1
Event performance
80th event percentile
PI
76.8
Prospect index
80th event percentile
ORtg
89.0
Points / 100 poss.
93rd event percentile
DRtg
31.1
Lower is better
99th event percentile
NRtg
+58.0
Two-way margin
98th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 89.0 · 93rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 31.1 · Stop% 1.1% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
3 games · 23 minutes · 28% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.0 APG78th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks54th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
80.1
80th event percentile
Prospect index
76.8
80th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
89.0
93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
31.1
99th event percentile
Two-way margin
+58.0
98th event percentile
Stop percentage
110.5%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.3 PPG
33rd event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
78th event percentile
Rebounding
0.7 RPG
9th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks
54th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
27.2% TS
35th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 80th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.0 ORtg and 31.1 DRtg, producing a +58.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Defensive stops
1.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
31.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+58.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 9th event percentile
Rebounding
0.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 33rd event percentile
Scoring load
2.3 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 35th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
27.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.3 PPG
33rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
27.2%
35th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
25.0%
36th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.0%
42nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
44.5%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
78th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
31.1
99th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+13.0
98th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
1.1%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.0 STL+BLK
54th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+58.0
98th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+10.1
80th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
80.1
80th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
76.8
80th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.9%
59th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.7 RPG
9th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
23.3
context7.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
28.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#29
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
2.3
PPG
0.7
RPG
2.0
APG
#29
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#29/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.3
PPG
0.7
RPG
2.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.3
P33
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
0.7
P9
True shooting
27%
P35
Two-way impact
+58.0
P98
Stops
1%
P100
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
3 made / 12 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
58% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
2.3 / game
3–12
FGM–FGA
0–7
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
2.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
6.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
2
REB
0.7 / game
2
OREB
0
DREB
0.7
REB/G
defense
9
STL
3.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
9
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
80.1
HESI
76.8
PI
89.0
ORtg
31.1
DRtg
+58.0
NRtg
+10.1
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
25%
eFG%
2%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+13.0
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #28Hana ElbazPF · Egyptrank_below · #30Salimata KoneCôte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#29
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#27
#28
#30
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
2.3
PPG
0.7
RPG
2.0
APG
3.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
27%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #29
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.3
PPG
0.7
RPG
2.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.3
P33
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
0.7
P9
True shooting
27%
P35
Two-way impact
+58.0
P98
Stops
1%
P100
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
3 made / 12 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
58% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
2.3 / game
3–12
FGM–FGA
0–7
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
2.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
6.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
2
REB
0.7 / game
2
OREB
0
DREB
0.7
REB/G
defense
9
STL
3.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
9
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
80.1
HESI
76.8
PI
89.0
ORtg
31.1
DRtg
+58.0
NRtg
+10.1
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
25%
eFG%
2%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+13.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.