ORtg
85.7
88th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Power Forward · EGY · b. 2008
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile5 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-08
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #28 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
82.3
Event performance
82nd event percentile
PI
77.3
Prospect index
81st event percentile
ORtg
85.7
Points / 100 poss.
88th event percentile
DRtg
55.6
Lower is better
79th event percentile
NRtg
+30.1
Two-way margin
85th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 85.7 · 88th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 55.6 · Stop% 74.8% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 75 minutes · 56% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
82.3
82nd event percentile
Prospect index
77.3
81st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.7
88th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
55.6
79th event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.1
85th event percentile
Stop percentage
74.8%
76th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
5.0 PPG
62nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
57th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
38th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.0% TS
64th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Offensive Impact
85.7 ORtg · 88th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+30.1 Net Rating · 83rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 82nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 85.7 ORtg and 55.6 DRtg, producing a +30.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.
Offensive efficiency
85.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+30.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Defensive efficiency
55.6 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive activity
1.3 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
85.7
88th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
5.0 PPG
62nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.0%
64th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.1%
71st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.1%
80th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.3%
91st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
55.6
79th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.1
74th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
74.8%
76th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
38th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
25.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+30.1
85th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+13.0
82nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
82.3
82nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
77.3
81st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.3%
85th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
57th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
75.3
context12.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
55.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#28
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
#28
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.0
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
38%
P64
Two-way impact
+30.1
P85
Stops
75%
P76
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
36%
13 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
4 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
30
PTS
5.0 / game
13–36
FGM–FGA
0–14
3PM–3PA
4–8
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
4
TOV
0.7 / game
1.50×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
10
OREB
13
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
82.3
HESI
77.3
PI
85.7
ORtg
55.6
DRtg
+30.1
NRtg
+13.0
Stable NRtg
75%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
7%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
6.2
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.6
APG
1.2
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.2
P65
Playmaking
1.6
P67
Rebounding
5.4
P72
True shooting
45%
P74
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
36%
12 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
6 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
31
PTS
6.2 / game
12–33
FGM–FGA
6–15
3PM–3PA
1–4
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
6
TOV
1.2 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
27
REB
5.4 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
5.4
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
11
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
46%
eFG%
4%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#28
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
1.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
38%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #28
//quick_read
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.0
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
38%
P64
Two-way impact
+30.1
P85
Stops
75%
P76
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
36%
13 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
4 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
30
PTS
5.0 / game
13–36
FGM–FGA
0–14
3PM–3PA
4–8
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
4
TOV
0.7 / game
1.50×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
10
OREB
13
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
82.3
HESI
77.3
PI
85.7
ORtg
55.6
DRtg
+30.1
NRtg
+13.0
Stable NRtg
75%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
7%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #14
//quick_read
6.2
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.6
APG
1.2
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.2
P65
Playmaking
1.6
P67
Rebounding
5.4
P72
True shooting
45%
P74
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
36%
12 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
6 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
31
PTS
6.2 / game
12–33
FGM–FGA
6–15
3PM–3PA
1–4
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
6
TOV
1.2 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
27
REB
5.4 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
5.4
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
11
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
46%
eFG%
4%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.