ORtg
56.5
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile6 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Benin U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
Projected role requires another viewing
Projected role requires another viewing. No separator is established yet
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Offensive translation remains unresolved.
Defensive assignments
Defensive assignments remain unresolved; do not infer them from DRtg.
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_strength
strong
Fewer than four applicable traits observed
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive36.9 performance rating · rank 90 · 4 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 56.5 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive25.0% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive64.8% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Complete at least eight applicable trait observations
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #90 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
36.9
Event performance
37th event percentile
PI
41.0
Prospect index
37th event percentile
ORtg
56.5
Points / 100 poss.
50th event percentile
DRtg
76.8
Lower is better
18th event percentile
NRtg
-20.4
Two-way margin
40th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 56.5 · 50th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 76.8 · Stop% 64.8% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
4 games · 92 minutes · 60% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring load
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
36.9
37th event percentile
Prospect index
41.0
37th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
56.5
50th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.8
18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.4
40th event percentile
Stop percentage
64.8%
45th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
66th event percentile
Creation
3.5 APG
94th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
65th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.2% TS
55th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
3.5 APG · 94th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 37th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 56.5 ORtg and 76.8 DRtg, producing a -20.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and two-way margin.
Creation
3.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Defensive efficiency
76.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-20.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
56.5
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
5.5 PPG
66th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.2%
55th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.9%
40th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
19.2%
27th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.7%
context3.8 attempts per game
Free throws
57.1%
70th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
25.0%
43rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.5 APG
94th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
76.8
18th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.0
74th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.8%
45th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
65th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-20.4
40th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-15.7
37th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
36.9
37th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
41.0
37th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-2.1%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
91.7
context22.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#90
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
5.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
3.5
APG
#90
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#20
RANK
31
FIELD
37%
PERCENTILE
5.0
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
5.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
3.5
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
4
GP
5.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//current_rank
#90
of 142 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.5
APG
1.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
25%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #90
//quick_read
5.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
3.5
APG
4.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.5
P66
Playmaking
3.5
P94
Rebounding
2.8
P40
True shooting
34%
P55
Two-way impact
-20.4
P40
Stops
65%
P45
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
8 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
58% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
22
PTS
5.5 / game
5–26
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
8–14
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
3.5 / game
17
TOV
4.3 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
1
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
36.9
HESI
41.0
PI
56.5
ORtg
76.8
DRtg
-20.4
NRtg
-15.7
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+1.0
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
5.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.5
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.0
P40
Playmaking
4.5
P92
Rebounding
4.3
P52
True shooting
25%
P18
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
24%
9 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
20
PTS
5.0 / game
9–37
FGM–FGA
1–15
3PM–3PA
1–8
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
4.5 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
1.38×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
4.3 / game
3
OREB
14
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
16
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
26%
eFG%
0%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.