ORtg
56.5
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Sabrin EL HILALI
MAR · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator3.5 APG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.5 APGCreation · 94th event percentile
5.5 PPGScoring load · 66th event percentile
- 36.9
- HESI v2.1
- #90
- of 142
- 60%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #90 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
36.9
Event performance
37th event percentile
PI
41.0
Prospect index
37th event percentile
ORtg
56.5
Points / 100 poss.
50th event percentile
DRtg
76.8
Lower is better
18th event percentile
NRtg
-20.4
Two-way margin
40th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 56.5 · 50th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 76.8 · Stop% 64.8% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
4 games · 92 minutes · 60% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
3.5 APG94th event percentile
Scoring load
5.5 PPG66th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
36.9
37th event percentile
Prospect index
41.0
37th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
56.5
50th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.8
18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.4
40th event percentile
Stop percentage
64.8%
45th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
66th event percentile
Creation
3.5 APG
94th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
65th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.2% TS
55th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P94
Creator
3.5 APG · 94th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 37th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 56.5 ORtg and 76.8 DRtg, producing a -20.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 94th event percentile
Creation
3.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 66th event percentile
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 65th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 18th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 40th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.5 PPG
66th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.2%
55th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.9%
40th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
19.2%
27th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.7%
context3.8 attempts per game
Free throws
57.1%
70th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
25.0%
43rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.5 APG
94th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
76.8
18th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.0
74th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.8%
45th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
65th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-20.4
40th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-15.7
37th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
36.9
37th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
41.0
37th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-2.1%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
91.7
context22.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#90
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
5.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
3.5
APG
#90
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#20
RANK
31
FIELD
37%
PERCENTILE
5.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#90/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
3.5
APG
4.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.5
P66
Playmaking
3.5
P94
Rebounding
2.8
P40
True shooting
34%
P55
Two-way impact
-20.4
P40
Stops
65%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
8 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
58% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
5.5 / game
5–26
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
8–14
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
3.5 / game
17
TOV
4.3 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
1
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
36.9
HESI
41.0
PI
56.5
ORtg
76.8
DRtg
-20.4
NRtg
-15.7
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+1.0
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#20/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.5
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P40
Playmaking
4.5
P92
Rebounding
4.3
P52
True shooting
25%
P18
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
24%
9 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
5.0 / game
9–37
FGM–FGA
1–15
3PM–3PA
1–8
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
4.5 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
1.38×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
4.3 / game
3
OREB
14
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
16
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
26%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #89Maria NanyongaUgandarank_below · #91Agnes Nyamangu GichuriKenya
//current_rank
#90
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#88
Morocco
7.0 PPG 9.3 RPG 0.8 APG
//event_signalRebounder9.3 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#89
#91
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.5
APG
1.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
25%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #90
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
3.5
APG
4.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.5
P66
Playmaking
3.5
P94
Rebounding
2.8
P40
True shooting
34%
P55
Two-way impact
-20.4
P40
Stops
65%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
8 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
58% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
5.5 / game
5–26
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
8–14
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
3.5 / game
17
TOV
4.3 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
1
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
36.9
HESI
41.0
PI
56.5
ORtg
76.8
DRtg
-20.4
NRtg
-15.7
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+1.0
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.5
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P40
Playmaking
4.5
P92
Rebounding
4.3
P52
True shooting
25%
P18
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
24%
9 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
5.0 / game
9–37
FGM–FGA
1–15
3PM–3PA
1–8
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
4.5 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
1.38×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
4.3 / game
3
OREB
14
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
16
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
26%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.