ORtg
55.7
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2010
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
9.3 RPGRebounding · 95th event percentile
7.0 PPGScoring load · 77th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #88 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
37.6
Event performance
38th event percentile
PI
44.0
Prospect index
38th event percentile
ORtg
55.7
Points / 100 poss.
50th event percentile
DRtg
74.9
Lower is better
21st event percentile
NRtg
-19.2
Two-way margin
41st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 55.7 · 50th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 74.9 · Stop% 69.5% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
4 games · 108 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
37.6
38th event percentile
Prospect index
44.0
38th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
55.7
50th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.9
21st event percentile
Two-way margin
-19.2
41st event percentile
Stop percentage
69.5%
67th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
77th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
40th event percentile
Rebounding
9.3 RPG
95th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
45th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.8% TS
54th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
9.3 RPG · 95th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 38th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 55.7 ORtg and 74.9 DRtg, producing a -19.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Rebounding
9.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive stops
69.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
74.9 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
55.7
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
7.0 PPG
77th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.8%
54th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
30.3%
51st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.3%
63rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
42.1%
31st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.8%
57th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
40th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
74.9
21st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.9
81st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
69.5%
67th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
45th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-19.2
41st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-15.4
38th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
37.6
38th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
44.0
38th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.5%
56th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
9.3 RPG
95th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
108.1
context27.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#88
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
7.0
PPG
9.3
RPG
0.8
APG
#88
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#17
RANK
31
FIELD
47%
PERCENTILE
6.3
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
7.0
PPG
9.3
RPG
0.8
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.0
P77
Playmaking
0.8
P40
Rebounding
9.3
P95
True shooting
34%
P54
Two-way impact
-19.2
P41
Stops
69%
P67
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
10 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
28
PTS
7.0 / game
10–33
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
15
TOV
3.8 / game
0.20×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
37
REB
9.3 / game
11
OREB
26
DREB
9.3
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
11
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
37.6
HESI
44.0
PI
55.7
ORtg
74.9
DRtg
-19.2
NRtg
-15.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
4%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
6.3
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.3
P50
Playmaking
1.3
P45
Rebounding
7.3
P77
True shooting
36%
P50
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
7 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
11 made / 24 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
6.3 / game
7–24
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
11–24
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
29
REB
7.3 / game
11
OREB
18
DREB
7.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
3
BLK
0.8 / game
9
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
29%
eFG%
2%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#88
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.3
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.3
APG
0.0
SPG
0.8
BPG
—
3P%
36%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #88
//quick_read
7.0
PPG
9.3
RPG
0.8
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.0
P77
Playmaking
0.8
P40
Rebounding
9.3
P95
True shooting
34%
P54
Two-way impact
-19.2
P41
Stops
69%
P67
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
10 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
28
PTS
7.0 / game
10–33
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
15
TOV
3.8 / game
0.20×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
37
REB
9.3 / game
11
OREB
26
DREB
9.3
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
11
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
37.6
HESI
44.0
PI
55.7
ORtg
74.9
DRtg
-19.2
NRtg
-15.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
4%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #17
//quick_read
6.3
PPG
7.3
RPG
1.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.3
P50
Playmaking
1.3
P45
Rebounding
7.3
P77
True shooting
36%
P50
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
7 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
11 made / 24 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
6.3 / game
7–24
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
11–24
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
29
REB
7.3 / game
11
OREB
18
DREB
7.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
3
BLK
0.8 / game
9
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
29%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.