back_to_rankings
Douae Laachir portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Douae Laachir

MAR · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

3
film items
0
scout badges
On file
scout report

01

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured highlight

Highlight

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Highlight

scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

  • Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Highlight
  • Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Highlight

02

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Ahmed Tareq

Report date: 2026-09-01

Full game film4 games watchedMedium confidence
scout_note

Scout's note

she has the size that allow her to rebound defensively & offensively but her foot work needs to improve and her abilty to use the board also

strengths_and_improvements

Evaluation

strengths

( offensive & Defensive ) Rebounding

areas_to_improve

Foot Work Pysical Game Scoring

ovr_methodology

HESI OVR · full breakdown

Context-adjusted within the evaluation event pool.

//overall · event_scoped

59C

methodology

HESI scouting evaluation (position-weighted attribute model)

FIBA U18 Afrobasket

Intangibles50
Positional Size75
Physical Tools50
Offensive Ability53
Defensive Ability67

OVR is context-adjusted using event-specific competition data. It reflects performance within this event pool only and should not be compared directly across leagues, regions or age groups.

Event-scoped rating: computed within a single event/pool. Not comparable across leagues, regions, or age groups.

03

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #88 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

37.6

Event performance

38th event percentile

PI

44.0

Prospect index

38th event percentile

ORtg

55.7

Points / 100 poss.

50th event percentile

DRtg

74.9

Lower is better

21st event percentile

NRtg

-19.2

Two-way margin

41st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 55.7 · 50th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 74.9 · Stop% 69.5% · Team DRtg 77.8

Sample context

4 games · 108 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

9.3 RPG95th event percentile

Scoring load

7.0 PPG77th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

37.6

38th event percentile

Prospect index

44.0

38th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

55.7

50th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

74.9

21st event percentile

Two-way margin

-19.2

41st event percentile

Stop percentage

69.5%

67th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.0 PPG

77th event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

40th event percentile

Rebounding

9.3 RPG

95th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks

45th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.8% TS

54th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P95

    Rebounder

    9.3 RPG · 95th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 38th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 55.7 ORtg and 74.9 DRtg, producing a -19.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Rebounding

    9.3 RPG

    95th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  2. Scoring load

    7.0 PPG

    77th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Defensive stops

    69.5% Stop%

    67th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    74.9 DRtg

    21st event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

55.7

50th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.0 PPG

77th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

33.8%

54th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

30.3%

51st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

30.3%

63rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

42.1%

31st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

29.8%

57th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

40th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

74.9

21st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+2.9

81st event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

69.5%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.8 STL+BLK

45th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

34.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-19.2

41st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-15.4

38th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

37.6

38th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

44.0

38th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.5%

56th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

9.3 RPG

95th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

4

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

108.1

context

27.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

64.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#88

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

366.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

04

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

4

GP

7.0

PPG

9.3

RPG

0.8

APG

#88

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#17

RANK

31

FIELD

47%

PERCENTILE

6.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

4

GP

7.0

PPG

9.3

RPG

0.8

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

4

GP

6.3

PPG

7.3

RPG

1.3

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Isis Stella Omoladé Bokpe portrait#86

    Isis Stella Omoladé Bokpe

    Point Guard · Benin

    0.0 PPG 0.5 RPG 0.0 APG

05

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

6.3

PPG

7.3

RPG

1.3

APG

0.0

SPG

0.8

BPG

—

3P%

36%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

4 GP · event rank #88

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.0

PPG

9.3

RPG

0.8

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

34%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.0

P77

Playmaking

0.8

P40

Rebounding

9.3

P95

True shooting

34%

P54

Two-way impact

-19.2

P41

Stops

69%

P67

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

10 made / 33 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

42%

8 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 33●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

28

PTS

7.0 / game

10–33

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

8–19

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.8 / game

15

TOV

3.8 / game

0.20×

AST:TOV

15

FD

rebounding

37

REB

9.3 / game

11

OREB

26

DREB

9.3

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.5 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

11

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

37.6

HESI

44.0

PI

55.7

ORtg

74.9

DRtg

-19.2

NRtg

-15.4

Stable NRtg

69%

Stop%

30%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

4%

PIE

77.8

Team DRtg

+2.9

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games108 minutes27.0 min/game64% sample weightrank #88 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #17

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

7.3

RPG

1.3

APG

2.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P50

Playmaking

1.3

P45

Rebounding

7.3

P77

True shooting

36%

P50

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

29%

7 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

46%

11 made / 24 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 24●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

25

PTS

6.3 / game

7–24

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

11–24

FTM–FTA

creation

5

AST

1.3 / game

9

TOV

2.3 / game

0.56×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

29

REB

7.3 / game

11

OREB

18

DREB

7.3

REB/G

defense

0

STL

0.0 / game

3

BLK

0.8 / game

9

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

29%

eFG%

2%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #17 of 31

06

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.