Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Aya Saibi portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Aya Saibi

Combo Guard · TUN · b. 2008

//measurables

175 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalRim Protection2.0 BPG · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

3.2 stocksDefensive activity · 71st event percentile

4.3 RPGRebounding · 64th event percentile

41.1
HESI v2.1
#87
of 142
67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #87 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

41.1

Event performance

41st event percentile

PI

44.4

Prospect index

39th event percentile

ORtg

44.2

Points / 100 poss.

33rd event percentile

DRtg

60.9

Lower is better

59th event percentile

NRtg

-16.7

Two-way margin

43rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 44.2 · 33rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 60.9 · Stop% 72.8% · Team DRtg 62.1

Sample context

6 games · 123 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

3.2 stocks71st event percentile

Rebounding

4.3 RPG64th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

41.1

41st event percentile

Prospect index

44.4

39th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

44.2

33rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

60.9

59th event percentile

Two-way margin

-16.7

43rd event percentile

Stop percentage

72.8%

76th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.7 PPG

49th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Rebounding

4.3 RPG

64th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.2 stocks

71st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

32.0% TS

48th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P98

    Rim Protection

    2.0 BPG · 98th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 41st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 44.2 ORtg and 60.9 DRtg, producing a -16.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive activity. The lowest relative area is offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    72.8% Stop%

    76th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive activity

    3.2 steals + blocks/G

    71st event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Offensive efficiency

    44.2 ORtg

    33rd event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

44.2

33rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.7 PPG

49th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

32.0%

48th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

31.7%

55th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

26.7%

48th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

17.6%

context

2.8 attempts per game

Free throws

30.0%

21st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

20.2%

31st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

60.9

59th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.2

76th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

72.8%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.2 STL+BLK

71st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-16.7

43rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-14.0

41st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

41.1

41st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

44.4

39th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-3.0%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.3 RPG

64th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

123.4

context

20.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#87

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

505.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

3.7

PPG

4.3

RPG

1.0

APG

#87

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#1

RANK

31

FIELD

100%

PERCENTILE

12.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#87/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

4.3

RPG

1.0

APG

4.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

32%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P49

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

4.3

P64

True shooting

32%

P48

Two-way impact

-16.7

P43

Stops

73%

P76

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

27%

8 made / 30 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

3 made / 17 attempts

FT

Free throws

30%

3 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

57% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

22

PTS

3.7 / game

8–30

FGM–FGA

3–17

3PM–3PA

3–10

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.0 / game

24

TOV

4.0 / game

0.25×

AST:TOV

8

FD

rebounding

26

REB

4.3 / game

7

OREB

19

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

12

BLK

2.0 / game

16

PF

19

STL+BLK

3.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

41.1

HESI

44.4

PI

44.2

ORtg

60.9

DRtg

-16.7

NRtg

-14.0

Stable NRtg

73%

Stop%

20%

Floor%

32%

eFG%

-3%

PIE

62.1

Team DRtg

+1.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games123 minutes20.6 min/game67% sample weightrank #87 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#1/31view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

7.5

RPG

2.0

APG

2.5

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P90

Playmaking

2.0

P65

Rebounding

7.5

P82

True shooting

51%

P89

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

45%

18 made / 40 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

27%

4 made / 15 attempts

FT

Free throws

47%

9 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

38% of attempts from three

●2PA 25●3PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

49

PTS

12.3 / game

18–40

FGM–FGA

4–15

3PM–3PA

9–19

FTM–FTA

creation

8

AST

2.0 / game

10

TOV

2.5 / game

0.80×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

30

REB

7.5 / game

7

OREB

23

DREB

7.5

REB/G

defense

8

STL

2.0 / game

8

BLK

2.0 / game

5

PF

16

STL+BLK

4.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

50%

eFG%

12%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #1 of 31
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #86Isis Stella Omoladé BokpePG · Benin

//current_rank

#87

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #88Douae LaachirMorocco
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Rahma Nefzi portrait#85

    Rahma Nefzi

    Shooting Guard · Tunisia

    4.0 PPG 3.8 RPG 0.2 APG

  • Isis Stella Omoladé Bokpe portrait#86

    Isis Stella Omoladé Bokpe

    Point Guard · Benin

    0.0 PPG 0.5 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Douae Laachir portrait#88

    Douae Laachir

    Morocco

    7.0 PPG 9.3 RPG 0.8 APG

    //event_signalRebounder9.3 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

12.3

PPG

7.5

RPG

2.0

APG

2.0

SPG

2.0

BPG

—

3P%

51%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #87

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

4.3

RPG

1.0

APG

4.0

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

32%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P49

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

4.3

P64

True shooting

32%

P48

Two-way impact

-16.7

P43

Stops

73%

P76

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

27%

8 made / 30 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

3 made / 17 attempts

FT

Free throws

30%

3 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

57% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

22

PTS

3.7 / game

8–30

FGM–FGA

3–17

3PM–3PA

3–10

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.0 / game

24

TOV

4.0 / game

0.25×

AST:TOV

8

FD

rebounding

26

REB

4.3 / game

7

OREB

19

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

12

BLK

2.0 / game

16

PF

19

STL+BLK

3.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

41.1

HESI

44.4

PI

44.2

ORtg

60.9

DRtg

-16.7

NRtg

-14.0

Stable NRtg

73%

Stop%

20%

Floor%

32%

eFG%

-3%

PIE

62.1

Team DRtg

+1.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games123 minutes20.6 min/game67% sample weightrank #87 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #1

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

7.5

RPG

2.0

APG

2.5

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P90

Playmaking

2.0

P65

Rebounding

7.5

P82

True shooting

51%

P89

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

45%

18 made / 40 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

27%

4 made / 15 attempts

FT

Free throws

47%

9 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

38% of attempts from three

●2PA 25●3PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

49

PTS

12.3 / game

18–40

FGM–FGA

4–15

3PM–3PA

9–19

FTM–FTA

creation

8

AST

2.0 / game

10

TOV

2.5 / game

0.80×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

30

REB

7.5 / game

7

OREB

23

DREB

7.5

REB/G

defense

8

STL

2.0 / game

8

BLK

2.0 / game

5

PF

16

STL+BLK

4.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

50%

eFG%

12%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #1 of 31

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.