ORtg
45.9
36th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Rahma Nefzi
Shooting Guard · TUN · b. 2010
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
36.5% TSScoring efficiency · 59th event percentile
3.8 RPGRebounding · 57th event percentile
- 38.3
- HESI v2.1
- #85
- of 142
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #85 of 142 · Established
HESI
38.3
Event performance
38th event percentile
PI
44.5
Prospect index
40th event percentile
ORtg
45.9
Points / 100 poss.
36th event percentile
DRtg
64.4
Lower is better
47th event percentile
NRtg
-18.5
Two-way margin
42nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 45.9 · 36th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 64.4 · Stop% 64.5% · Team DRtg 62.1
Sample context
6 games · 111 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
36.5% TS59th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG57th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
38.3
38th event percentile
Prospect index
44.5
40th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
45.9
36th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
64.4
47th event percentile
Two-way margin
-18.5
42nd event percentile
Stop percentage
64.5%
43rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
56th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
13th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
57th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
41st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.5% TS
59th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 38th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 45.9 ORtg and 64.4 DRtg, producing a -18.5 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 13th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 36th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
45.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
56th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.5%
59th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.4%
65th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.0%
42nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context4.5 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
98th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
17.1%
24th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
13th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
64.4
47th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.2
45th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.5%
43rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
41st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
30.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-18.5
42nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-15.0
38th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
38.3
38th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
44.5
40th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.4%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
57th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
110.6
context18.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#85
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
505.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.2
APG
#85
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#11
RANK
31
FIELD
67%
PERCENTILE
5.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#85/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.2
APG
3.7
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P56
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
37%
P59
Two-way impact
-18.5
P42
Stops
65%
P43
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
8 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
6 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
84% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–32
FGM–FGA
6–27
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
22
TOV
3.7 / game
0.05×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
4
OREB
19
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
2
PF
5
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.3
HESI
44.5
PI
45.9
ORtg
64.4
DRtg
-18.5
NRtg
-15.0
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
17%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
1%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#11/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P44
Playmaking
3.0
P85
Rebounding
3.3
P32
True shooting
38%
P56
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
9 made / 30 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
67% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 20
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
9–30
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
3.0 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
1
OREB
12
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
3
BLK
0.8 / game
6
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38%
eFG%
5%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #84Malak Ayash AhmedMoroccorank_below · #86Isis Stella Omoladé BokpePG · Benin
//current_rank
#85
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#83
#84
#86
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
1.8
SPG
0.8
BPG
—
3P%
38%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #85
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.2
APG
3.7
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P56
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
37%
P59
Two-way impact
-18.5
P42
Stops
65%
P43
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
8 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
6 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
84% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–32
FGM–FGA
6–27
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
22
TOV
3.7 / game
0.05×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
4
OREB
19
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
2
PF
5
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.3
HESI
44.5
PI
45.9
ORtg
64.4
DRtg
-18.5
NRtg
-15.0
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
17%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
1%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #11
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P44
Playmaking
3.0
P85
Rebounding
3.3
P32
True shooting
38%
P56
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
9 made / 30 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
67% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 20
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
9–30
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
3.0 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
1
OREB
12
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
3
BLK
0.8 / game
6
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38%
eFG%
5%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.