ORtg
55.6
49th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Malak Ayash Ahmed
MAR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
39.4% TSScoring efficiency · 69th event percentile
0.5 APGCreation · 31st event percentile
- 40.4
- HESI v2.1
- #84
- of 142
- 37%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #84 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
40.4
Event performance
40th event percentile
PI
45.0
Prospect index
41st event percentile
ORtg
55.6
Points / 100 poss.
49th event percentile
DRtg
80.0
Lower is better
12th event percentile
NRtg
-24.4
Two-way margin
35th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 55.6 · 49th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 80.0 · Stop% 57.3% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
4 games · 36 minutes · 37% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
39.4% TS69th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG31st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
40.4
40th event percentile
Prospect index
45.0
41st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
55.6
49th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.0
12th event percentile
Two-way margin
-24.4
35th event percentile
Stop percentage
57.3%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
26th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
31st event percentile
Rebounding
1.3 RPG
20th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
28th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.4% TS
69th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 40th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 55.6 ORtg and 80.0 DRtg, producing a -24.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 69th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 12th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 20th event percentile
Rebounding
1.3 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 24th event percentile
Defensive stops
57.3% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.8 PPG
26th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.4%
69th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.5%
75th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.5%
85th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.5 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
28.2%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
31st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
80.0
12th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.2
46th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.3%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
28th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
9.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-24.4
35th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-14.4
40th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
40.4
40th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
45.0
41st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.1%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.3 RPG
20th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
35.5
context8.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
37.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#84
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
1.8
PPG
1.3
RPG
0.5
APG
#84
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#84/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.8
PPG
1.3
RPG
0.5
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.8
P26
Playmaking
0.5
P31
Rebounding
1.3
P20
True shooting
39%
P69
Two-way impact
-24.4
P35
Stops
57%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
25% of attempts from three
●2PA 6●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
1.8 / game
3–8
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
0.40×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.3 / game
3
OREB
2
DREB
1.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40.4
HESI
45.0
PI
55.6
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
-24.4
NRtg
-14.4
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
1%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #83Mame Maty DiopF · Senegalrank_below · #85Rahma NefziSG · Tunisia
//current_rank
#84
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#82
#83
#85
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
1.8
PPG
1.3
RPG
0.5
APG
0.8
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
39%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #84
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.8
PPG
1.3
RPG
0.5
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.8
P26
Playmaking
0.5
P31
Rebounding
1.3
P20
True shooting
39%
P69
Two-way impact
-24.4
P35
Stops
57%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
25% of attempts from three
●2PA 6●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
1.8 / game
3–8
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
0.40×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.3 / game
3
OREB
2
DREB
1.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40.4
HESI
45.0
PI
55.6
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
-24.4
NRtg
-14.4
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
1%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.