ORtg
40.3
28th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
KEN · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
2.5 APGCreation · 85th event percentile
3.7 stocksDefensive activity · 80th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #127 of 142 · High confidence
HESI
10.6
Event performance
11th event percentile
PI
21.2
Prospect index
11th event percentile
ORtg
40.3
Points / 100 poss.
28th event percentile
DRtg
73.2
Lower is better
23rd event percentile
NRtg
-32.9
Two-way margin
25th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 40.3 · 28th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.2 · Stop% 57.8% · Team DRtg 69.2
Sample context
6 games · 213 minutes · 78% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
10.6
11th event percentile
Prospect index
21.2
11th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
40.3
28th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.2
23rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-32.9
25th event percentile
Stop percentage
57.8%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
6.5 PPG
76th event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
85th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.7 stocks
80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
21.2% TS
16th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Activity
4.5 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 75th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 11th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 40.3 ORtg and 73.2 DRtg, producing a -32.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive activity, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, defensive efficiency, and defensive stops.
Creation
2.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive activity
3.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Scoring load
6.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
21.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Defensive efficiency
73.2 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
57.8% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
40.3
28th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
6.5 PPG
76th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
21.2%
16th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
15.1%
13th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
14.5%
14th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
3.8%
context4.3 attempts per game
Free throws
44.4%
36th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
21.3%
33rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.5 APG
85th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.2
23rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
69.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.0
29th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.8%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.7 STL+BLK
80th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
59.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-32.9
25th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-27.6
11th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
10.6
11th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
21.2
11th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-11.2%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
212.9
context35.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
78.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#127
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
579.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.5
APG
#127
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
6.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.5
APG
5.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
21%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.5
P76
Playmaking
2.5
P85
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
21%
P16
Two-way impact
-32.9
P25
Stops
58%
P24
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
14%
11 made / 76 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
4%
1 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
16 made / 36 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
39
PTS
6.5 / game
11–76
FGM–FGA
1–26
3PM–3PA
16–36
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
35
TOV
5.8 / game
0.43×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
20
STL
3.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
22
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
10.6
HESI
21.2
PI
40.3
ORtg
73.2
DRtg
-32.9
NRtg
-27.6
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
21%
Floor%
15%
eFG%
-11%
PIE
69.2
Team DRtg
-4.0
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#127
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
6.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.5
APG
3.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
4%
3P%
21%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #127
//quick_read
6.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.5
APG
5.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
21%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.5
P76
Playmaking
2.5
P85
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
21%
P16
Two-way impact
-32.9
P25
Stops
58%
P24
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
14%
11 made / 76 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
4%
1 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
16 made / 36 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
39
PTS
6.5 / game
11–76
FGM–FGA
1–26
3PM–3PA
16–36
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
35
TOV
5.8 / game
0.43×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
20
STL
3.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
22
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
10.6
HESI
21.2
PI
40.3
ORtg
73.2
DRtg
-32.9
NRtg
-27.6
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
21%
Floor%
15%
eFG%
-11%
PIE
69.2
Team DRtg
-4.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.