Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Vanissa Dokowane Wanrema

CAF · b. 2009

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

3.4 stocksDefensive activity · 84th event percentile

5.8 PPGScoring load · 69th event percentile

11.3
HESI v2.1: #126
of 142: 67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #126 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

11.3

Event performance

12th event percentile

21.8

Prospect index

12th event percentile

ORtg

37.0

Points / 100 poss.

26th event percentile

DRtg

73.0

Lower is better

24th event percentile

NRtg

-36.0

Two-way margin

24th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 37.0 · 26th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 73.0 · Stop% 63.1% · Team DRtg 72.5

Sample context

5 games · 121 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

3.4 stocks84th event percentile

Scoring load

5.8 PPG69th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

11.3

12th event percentile

Prospect index

21.8

12th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

37.0

26th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

73.0

24th event percentile

Two-way margin

-36.0

24th event percentile

Stop percentage

63.1%

40th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.8 PPG

69th event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

42nd event percentile

Rebounding

4.2 RPG

62nd event percentile

Defensive activity

3.4 stocks

84th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

26.4% TS

32nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P77
Activity
4.2 RPG + 3.4 defensive plays/G · 77th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 12th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 37.0 ORtg and 73.0 DRtg, producing a -36.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, defensive efficiency, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive activity
3.4 steals + blocks/G
84th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Scoring load
5.8 PPG
69th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Two-way margin
-36.0 NRtg
24th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Defensive efficiency
73.0 DRtg
24th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Offensive efficiency
37.0 ORtg
26th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

37.0

26th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.8 PPG

69th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

26.4%

32nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

24.0%

33rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

22.0%

34th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

20.0%

context

2.0 attempts per game

Free throws

45.5%

38th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

18.0%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

42nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

73.0

24th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-0.5

60th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

63.1%

40th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.4 STL+BLK

84th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

42.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-36.0

24th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-26.9

12th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

11.3

12th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

21.8

12th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-37.1%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.2 RPG

62nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

120.8

context

24.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

66.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#126

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

552.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5.8

PPG

4.2

RPG

0.8

APG

#126

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#126/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.8

PPG

4.2

RPG

0.8

APG

7.2

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

26%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.8

P69

Playmaking

0.8

P42

Rebounding

4.2

P62

True shooting

26%

P32

Two-way impact

-36.0

P24

Stops

63%

P40

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

22%

11 made / 50 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

Free throws

46%

5 made / 11 attempts

Shot selection

20% of attempts from three

●2PA 40●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.8 / game

11–50

FGM–FGA

2–10

3PM–3PA

5–11

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.8 / game

TOV

7.2 / game

0.11×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.2 / game

OREB

DREB

4.2

REB/G

defense

STL

2.8 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

3.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

11.3

HESI

21.8

37.0

ORtg

73.0

DRtg

-36.0

NRtg

-26.9

Stable NRtg

63%

Stop%

18%

Floor%

24%

eFG%

-37%

PIE

72.5

Team DRtg

-0.5

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #125Trixy Akinyi OchiengKenya

//current_rank

#126

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #127Brenda Akinyi OchiengKenya

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.8

PPG

4.2

RPG

0.8

APG

2.8

SPG

0.6

BPG

20%

3P%

26%

TS%

event_stats