ORtg
50.0
21st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.2 RPGRebounding · 29th event percentile
2.0 PPGScoring load · 26th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #125 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
10.2
Event performance
11th event percentile
PI
19.7
Prospect index
10th event percentile
ORtg
50.0
Points / 100 poss.
21st event percentile
DRtg
88.7
Lower is better
21st event percentile
NRtg
-38.7
Two-way margin
14th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 50.0 · 21st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.7 · Stop% 45.4% · Team DRtg 83.1
Sample context
5 games · 54 minutes · 47% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
10.2
11th event percentile
Prospect index
19.7
10th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
50.0
21st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.7
21st event percentile
Two-way margin
-38.7
14th event percentile
Stop percentage
45.4%
12th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
26th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
29th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
15th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
25.2% TS
18th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 11th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 50.0 ORtg and 88.7 DRtg, producing a -38.7 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Defensive stops
45.4% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Two-way margin
-38.7 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
50.0
21st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
2.0 PPG
26th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
25.2%
18th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
26.3%
27th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.3%
37th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
0.0%
3rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.8%
21st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.7
21st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
83.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.6
21st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
45.4%
12th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
15th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
10.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-38.7
14th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-21.1
11th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
10.2
11th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
19.7
10th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-2.8%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.2 RPG
29th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
54.0
context10.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
47.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#125
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
412.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.0
APG
#125
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#125
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
2.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
25%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #125
//quick_read
2.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
2.0
P26
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
2.2
P29
True shooting
25%
P18
Two-way impact
-38.7
P14
Stops
45%
P12
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
26%
5 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
10
PTS
2.0 / game
5–19
FGM–FGA
0–5
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
5
TOV
1.0 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.2 / game
4
OREB
7
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
10.2
HESI
19.7
PI
50.0
ORtg
88.7
DRtg
-38.7
NRtg
-21.1
Stable NRtg
45%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
26%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
-5.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.