ORtg
31.3
7th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
RWA · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
205 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.5 stocksDefensive activity · 60th event percentile
25.5% TSScoring efficiency · 18th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #123 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
11.7
Event performance
12th event percentile
PI
20.8
Prospect index
11th event percentile
ORtg
31.3
Points / 100 poss.
7th event percentile
DRtg
95.3
Lower is better
8th event percentile
NRtg
-64.0
Two-way margin
4th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 31.3 · 7th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 95.3 · Stop% 44.0% · Team DRtg 88.4
Sample context
2 games · 21 minutes · 26% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
11.7
12th event percentile
Prospect index
20.8
11th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
31.3
7th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
95.3
8th event percentile
Two-way margin
-64.0
4th event percentile
Stop percentage
44.0%
10th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
1.5 PPG
18th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
0.5 RPG
4th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
60th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
25.5% TS
18th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 12th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 31.3 ORtg and 95.3 DRtg, producing a -64.0 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, rebounding, and creation.
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Two-way margin
-64.0 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Rebounding
0.5 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
31.3
7th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
1.5 PPG
18th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
25.5%
18th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
20.0%
18th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
20.0%
22nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
45th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
16.6%
10th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
95.3
8th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.9
13th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
44.0%
10th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
60th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
3.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-64.0
4th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-20.3
12th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
11.7
12th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
20.8
11th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.9%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.5 RPG
4th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
2
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
20.6
context10.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
25.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#123
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
421.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
2
GP
1.5
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.0
APG
#123
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#35
RANK
70
FIELD
51%
PERCENTILE
3.7
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
2
GP
1.5
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
3
GP
3.7
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#123
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
3.7
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
56%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
2 GP · event rank #123
//quick_read
1.5
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.0
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
26%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.5
P18
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
0.5
P4
True shooting
26%
P18
Two-way impact
-64.0
P4
Stops
44%
P10
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
3
PTS
1.5 / game
1–5
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
5
TOV
2.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
1
REB
0.5 / game
1
OREB
0
DREB
0.5
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.5 / game
2
BLK
1.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
11.7
HESI
20.8
PI
31.3
ORtg
95.3
DRtg
-64.0
NRtg
-20.3
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
17%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
88.4
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
3 GP · event rank #35
//quick_read
3.7
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.7
P39
Playmaking
0.0
P8
Rebounding
2.3
P35
True shooting
56%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
50%
4 made / 8 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
13% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
3.7 / game
4–8
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
0
TOV
0.0 / game
—
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
7
REB
2.3 / game
2
OREB
5
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
3
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
50%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.