back_to_rankings
Soulaymane EL Belkasmi portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Soulaymane EL Belkasmi

MAR · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

3.5 RPGRebounding · 47th event percentile

0.0 stocksDefensive activity · 15th event percentile

12.4
HESI v2.1
#121
of 138
24%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #121 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

12.4

Event performance

13th event percentile

PI

21.4

Prospect index

13th event percentile

ORtg

12.9

Points / 100 poss.

3rd event percentile

DRtg

78.1

Lower is better

50th event percentile

NRtg

-65.2

Two-way margin

3rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 12.9 · 3rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.1 · Stop% 71.4% · Team DRtg 83.1

Sample context

2 games · 19 minutes · 24% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

3.5 RPG47th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks15th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

12.4

13th event percentile

Prospect index

21.4

13th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

12.9

3rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.1

50th event percentile

Two-way margin

-65.2

3rd event percentile

Stop percentage

71.4%

80th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

0.0 PPG

3rd event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

3.5 RPG

47th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks

15th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

0.0% TS

3rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 13th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 12.9 ORtg and 78.1 DRtg, producing a -65.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    71.4% Stop%

    80th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Two-way margin

    -65.2 NRtg

    3rd event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  2. Scoring load

    0.0 PPG

    3rd event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    0.0% TS

    3rd event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

12.9

3rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

0.0 PPG

3rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

0.0%

4th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

0.0%

4th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Floor%

6.0%

3rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.1

50th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

83.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+5.0

88th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

71.4%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.0 STL+BLK

15th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

5.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-65.2

3rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-19.7

13th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

12.4

13th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

21.4

13th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-0.4%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.5 RPG

47th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

2

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

19.0

context

9.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

24.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#121

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

412.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2

GP

0.0

PPG

3.5

RPG

0.0

APG

#121

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2

GP

0.0

PPG

3.5

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Norojaona Mathieu Razafindrambinina portrait#119

    Norojaona Mathieu Razafindrambinina

    Point Guard · Madagascar

    1.8 PPG 1.8 RPG 0.6 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

2

GP

0.0

PPG

3.5

RPG

0.0

APG

0.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

0%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

2 GP · event rank #121

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.0

PPG

3.5

RPG

0.0

APG

0.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

0%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.0

P3

Playmaking

0.0

P6

Rebounding

3.5

P47

True shooting

0%

P3

Two-way impact

-65.2

P3

Stops

71%

P80

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 2●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

0

PTS

0.0 / game

0–2

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

0

AST

0.0 / game

1

TOV

0.5 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

0

FD

rebounding

7

REB

3.5 / game

1

OREB

6

DREB

3.5

REB/G

defense

0

STL

0.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

5

PF

0

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

12.4

HESI

21.4

PI

12.9

ORtg

78.1

DRtg

-65.2

NRtg

-19.7

Stable NRtg

71%

Stop%

6%

Floor%

0%

eFG%

-0%

PIE

83.1

Team DRtg

+5.0

Def. lift

sample_context

2 games19 minutes9.5 min/game24% sample weightrank #121 of 138

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.