ORtg
12.9
3rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
3.5 RPGRebounding · 47th event percentile
0.0 stocksDefensive activity · 15th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #121 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
12.4
Event performance
13th event percentile
PI
21.4
Prospect index
13th event percentile
ORtg
12.9
Points / 100 poss.
3rd event percentile
DRtg
78.1
Lower is better
50th event percentile
NRtg
-65.2
Two-way margin
3rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 12.9 · 3rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 78.1 · Stop% 71.4% · Team DRtg 83.1
Sample context
2 games · 19 minutes · 24% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
12.4
13th event percentile
Prospect index
21.4
13th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
12.9
3rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
78.1
50th event percentile
Two-way margin
-65.2
3rd event percentile
Stop percentage
71.4%
80th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
0.0 PPG
3rd event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
3.5 RPG
47th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
15th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
0.0% TS
3rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 13th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 12.9 ORtg and 78.1 DRtg, producing a -65.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.
Defensive stops
71.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
-65.2 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Scoring load
0.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Scoring efficiency
0.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
12.9
3rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
0.0 PPG
3rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
0.0%
3rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
0.0%
4th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
0.0%
4th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Floor%
6.0%
3rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
78.1
50th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
83.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.0
88th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
71.4%
80th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
15th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
5.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-65.2
3rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-19.7
13th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
12.4
13th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
21.4
13th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.4%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.5 RPG
47th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
2
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
19.0
context9.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
24.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#121
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
412.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
2
GP
0.0
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.0
APG
#121
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
2
GP
0.0
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#121
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
0.0
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
0%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
2 GP · event rank #121
//quick_read
0.0
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.0
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
0%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
0.0
P3
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
3.5
P47
True shooting
0%
P3
Two-way impact
-65.2
P3
Stops
71%
P80
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–2
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
7
REB
3.5 / game
1
OREB
6
DREB
3.5
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
12.4
HESI
21.4
PI
12.9
ORtg
78.1
DRtg
-65.2
NRtg
-19.7
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
6%
Floor%
0%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
+5.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.