ORtg
45.6
16th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Herhodi Khenyo Raherivolaniaina
Center · MAD · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
199 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.2 stocksDefensive activity · 59th event percentile
3.8 RPGRebounding · 54th event percentile
- 13.1
- HESI v2.1
- #120
- of 138
- 64%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #120 of 138 · Established
HESI
13.1
Event performance
13th event percentile
PI
22.0
Prospect index
13th event percentile
ORtg
45.6
Points / 100 poss.
16th event percentile
DRtg
73.0
Lower is better
62nd event percentile
NRtg
-27.4
Two-way margin
26th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 45.6 · 16th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.0 · Stop% 66.6% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
6 games · 107 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks59th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG54th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
13.1
13th event percentile
Prospect index
22.0
13th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
45.6
16th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.0
62nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-27.4
26th event percentile
Stop percentage
66.6%
68th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.7 PPG
21st event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
39th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
54th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
59th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
20.2% TS
15th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 13th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 45.6 ORtg and 73.0 DRtg, producing a -27.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 68th event percentile
Defensive stops
66.6% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 15th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
20.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 16th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
45.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 21st event percentile
Scoring load
1.7 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.7 PPG
21st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
20.2%
15th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
21.7%
22nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
21.7%
26th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
0.0%
3rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
22.4%
19th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
39th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.0
62nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.5
63rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
66.6%
68th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
59th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-27.4
26th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-19.5
13th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
13.1
13th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
22.0
13th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-3.4%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
54th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
107.3
context17.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#120
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
1.7
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
#120
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#7
RANK
33
FIELD
81%
PERCENTILE
7.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#120/138Event board →
6
GP
1.7
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#7/33Event board →
4
GP
7.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
0.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #119Norojaona Mathieu RazafindrambininaPG · Madagascarrank_below · #121Soulaymane EL BelkasmiMorocco
//current_rank
#120
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#118
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
7.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
59%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #120
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.7
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.7
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.7
P21
Playmaking
0.7
P39
Rebounding
3.8
P54
True shooting
20%
P15
Two-way impact
-27.4
P26
Stops
67%
P68
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
22%
5 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
1.7 / game
5–23
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–4
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
7
TOV
1.2 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
6
OREB
17
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
23
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
13.1
HESI
22.0
PI
45.6
ORtg
73.0
DRtg
-27.4
NRtg
-19.5
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
22%
Floor%
22%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
+0.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.5
P74
Playmaking
0.8
P50
Rebounding
5.8
P77
True shooting
59%
P80
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
57%
13 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
30
PTS
7.5 / game
13–23
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
23
REB
5.8 / game
12
OREB
11
DREB
5.8
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
56%
eFG%
5%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.