back_to_rankings
Norojaona Mathieu Razafindrambinina portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Norojaona Mathieu Razafindrambinina

Point Guard · MAD · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

187 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 40th event percentile

33.3% TSScoring efficiency · 37th event percentile

13.9
HESI v2.1
#119
of 138
47%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #119 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

13.9

Event performance

14th event percentile

PI

22.6

Prospect index

14th event percentile

ORtg

35.3

Points / 100 poss.

11th event percentile

DRtg

70.8

Lower is better

70th event percentile

NRtg

-35.5

Two-way margin

17th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 35.3 · 11th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 70.8 · Stop% 71.7% · Team DRtg 73.5

Sample context

5 games · 52 minutes · 47% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.3% TS37th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

13.9

14th event percentile

Prospect index

22.6

14th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

35.3

11th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

70.8

70th event percentile

Two-way margin

-35.5

17th event percentile

Stop percentage

71.7%

81st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.8 PPG

23rd event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Rebounding

1.8 RPG

25th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.3% TS

37th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 14th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 35.3 ORtg and 70.8 DRtg, producing a -35.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    71.7% Stop%

    81st event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    70.8 DRtg

    70th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Offensive efficiency

    35.3 ORtg

    11th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

  2. Two-way margin

    -35.5 NRtg

    17th event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  3. Scoring load

    1.8 PPG

    23rd event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

35.3

11th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.8 PPG

23rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

33.3%

37th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

30.0%

38th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

30.0%

49th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.6 attempts per game

Free throws

37.5%

23rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

19.0%

13th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

70.8

70th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

73.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+2.7

80th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

71.7%

81st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

40th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

14.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-35.5

17th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-19.4

14th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

13.9

14th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

22.6

14th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.7%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.8 RPG

25th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

52.4

context

10.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

46.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#119

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

473.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

1.8

RPG

0.6

APG

#119

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6

Regional · 2026

#5

RANK

33

FIELD

88%

PERCENTILE

5.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

1.8

RPG

0.6

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6

Regional · 2026

4

GP

5.8

PPG

3.0

RPG

3.0

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Rayan Shawn Mehimon Diomande portrait#117

    Rayan Shawn Mehimon Diomande

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    0.3 PPG 0.5 RPG 0.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

5.8

PPG

3.0

RPG

3.0

APG

4.3

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

61%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #119

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

1.8

RPG

0.6

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

33%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P23

Playmaking

0.6

P34

Rebounding

1.8

P25

True shooting

33%

P37

Two-way impact

-35.5

P17

Stops

72%

P81

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

3 made / 10 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

38%

3 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.8 / game

3–10

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

3–8

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.6 / game

16

TOV

3.2 / game

0.19×

AST:TOV

7

FD

rebounding

9

REB

1.8 / game

2

OREB

7

DREB

1.8

REB/G

defense

5

STL

1.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

3

PF

5

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

13.9

HESI

22.6

PI

35.3

ORtg

70.8

DRtg

-35.5

NRtg

-19.4

Stable NRtg

72%

Stop%

19%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

73.5

Team DRtg

+2.7

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games52 minutes10.5 min/game47% sample weightrank #119 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026

4 GP · event rank #5

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.8

PPG

3.0

RPG

3.0

APG

2.5

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

61%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.8

P50

Playmaking

3.0

P94

Rebounding

3.0

P42

True shooting

61%

P86

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

56%

10 made / 18 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

3 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

33% of attempts from three

●2PA 12●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

5.8 / game

10–18

FGM–FGA

3–6

3PM–3PA

0–2

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

3.0 / game

10

TOV

2.5 / game

1.20×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

12

REB

3.0 / game

5

OREB

7

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

17

STL

4.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

4

PF

17

STL+BLK

4.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64%

eFG%

6%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #5 of 33

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.