ORtg
35.3
11th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · MAD · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 40th event percentile
33.3% TSScoring efficiency · 37th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #119 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
13.9
Event performance
14th event percentile
PI
22.6
Prospect index
14th event percentile
ORtg
35.3
Points / 100 poss.
11th event percentile
DRtg
70.8
Lower is better
70th event percentile
NRtg
-35.5
Two-way margin
17th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 35.3 · 11th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 70.8 · Stop% 71.7% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
5 games · 52 minutes · 47% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
13.9
14th event percentile
Prospect index
22.6
14th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
35.3
11th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
70.8
70th event percentile
Two-way margin
-35.5
17th event percentile
Stop percentage
71.7%
81st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
23rd event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
34th event percentile
Rebounding
1.8 RPG
25th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
40th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.3% TS
37th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 14th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 35.3 ORtg and 70.8 DRtg, producing a -35.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring load.
Defensive stops
71.7% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
70.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
35.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Two-way margin
-35.5 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Scoring load
1.8 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
35.3
11th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
1.8 PPG
23rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.3%
37th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
30.0%
38th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.0%
49th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.6 attempts per game
Free throws
37.5%
23rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
19.0%
13th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
34th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
70.8
70th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.7
80th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
71.7%
81st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
40th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
14.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-35.5
17th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-19.4
14th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
13.9
14th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
22.6
14th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.7%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.8 RPG
25th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
52.4
context10.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
46.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#119
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
1.8
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.6
APG
#119
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#5
RANK
33
FIELD
88%
PERCENTILE
5.8
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
1.8
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.6
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
4
GP
5.8
PPG
3.0
RPG
3.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#119
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.8
PPG
3.0
RPG
3.0
APG
4.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
61%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #119
//quick_read
1.8
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.6
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.8
P23
Playmaking
0.6
P34
Rebounding
1.8
P25
True shooting
33%
P37
Two-way impact
-35.5
P17
Stops
72%
P81
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
9
PTS
1.8 / game
3–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
3–8
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.6 / game
16
TOV
3.2 / game
0.19×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
9
REB
1.8 / game
2
OREB
7
DREB
1.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
13.9
HESI
22.6
PI
35.3
ORtg
70.8
DRtg
-35.5
NRtg
-19.4
Stable NRtg
72%
Stop%
19%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
+2.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
5.8
PPG
3.0
RPG
3.0
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.8
P50
Playmaking
3.0
P94
Rebounding
3.0
P42
True shooting
61%
P86
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
56%
10 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
10–18
FGM–FGA
3–6
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
3.0 / game
10
TOV
2.5 / game
1.20×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
12
REB
3.0 / game
5
OREB
7
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
17
STL
4.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
17
STL+BLK
4.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
64%
eFG%
6%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.