Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Cheick Oumar Mariko

Shooting Guard · MAD · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

184 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.0 stocksDefensive activity · 15th event percentile

0.0 APGCreation · 6th event percentile

14.6
HESI v2.1: #118
of 138: 17%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #118 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

14.6

Event performance

15th event percentile

23.2

Prospect index

15th event percentile

ORtg

0.0

Points / 100 poss.

1st event percentile

DRtg

86.8

Lower is better

28th event percentile

NRtg

-86.8

Two-way margin

1st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 0.0 · 1st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 86.8 · Stop% 34.1% · Team DRtg 73.5

Sample context

4 games · 13 minutes · 17% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks15th event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG6th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

14.6

15th event percentile

Prospect index

23.2

15th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

0.0

1st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

86.8

28th event percentile

Two-way margin

-86.8

1st event percentile

Stop percentage

34.1%

3rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

0.0 PPG

3rd event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

0.0 RPG

1st event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks

15th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

0.0% TS

3rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 15th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 0.0 ORtg and 86.8 DRtg, producing a -86.8 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Two-way margin
-86.8 NRtg
1st event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
0.0 ORtg
1st event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Rebounding
0.0 RPG
1st event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

0.0

1st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

0.0 PPG

3rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

0.0%

4th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

0.0%

4th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.8 attempts per game

Floor%

0.0%

1st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

86.8

28th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

73.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-13.3

1st event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

34.1%

3rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.0 STL+BLK

15th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

1.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-86.8

1st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-19.4

15th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

14.6

15th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

23.2

15th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-2.5%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

0.0 RPG

1st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

12.5

context

3.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

17.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#118

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

473.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

0.0

PPG

0.0

RPG

0.0

APG

#118

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6

Regional · 2026

#19

RANK

FIELD

44%

PERCENTILE

4.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#118/138Event board →

0.0

PPG

0.0

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6

Regional · 2026

#19/33Event board →

4.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #117Rayan Shawn Mehimon DiomandeSG · Côte d'Ivoire

//current_rank

#118

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #119Norojaona Mathieu RazafindrambininaPG · Madagascar

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#116
Fallou Mbacké Mané
Forward · Senegal
0.0 PPG 1.3 RPG 0.3 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

1.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

56%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

4 GP · event rank #118

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.0

PPG

0.0

RPG

0.0

APG

0.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.0

Playmaking

0.0

Rebounding

0.0

True shooting

Two-way impact

-86.8

Stops

34%

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

0 made / 6 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 3 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

50% of attempts from three

●2PA 3●3PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

0.0 / game

0–6

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.0 / game

TOV

0.3 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

0.0 / game

OREB

DREB

0.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

14.6

HESI

23.2

0.0

ORtg

86.8

DRtg

-86.8

NRtg

-19.4

Stable NRtg

34%

Stop%

Floor%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

73.5

Team DRtg

-13.3

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026

4 GP · event rank #19

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.5

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

56%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.0

P30

Playmaking

0.5

P38

Rebounding

1.0

True shooting

56%

P74

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

46%

6 made / 13 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

Free throws

100%

3 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

46% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.0 / game

6–13

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

3–3

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.5 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

0.29×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

1.0 / game

OREB

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

50%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.