ORtg
60.6
30th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
RWA · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 76th event percentile
1.6 APGCreation · 71st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #122 of 138 · Established
HESI
8.8
Event performance
9th event percentile
PI
20.9
Prospect index
12th event percentile
ORtg
60.6
Points / 100 poss.
30th event percentile
DRtg
89.4
Lower is better
18th event percentile
NRtg
-28.8
Two-way margin
25th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 60.6 · 30th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.4 · Stop% 57.4% · Team DRtg 88.4
Sample context
5 games · 127 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Creation
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
8.8
9th event percentile
Prospect index
20.9
12th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.6
30th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.4
18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-28.8
25th event percentile
Stop percentage
57.4%
42nd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
6.8 PPG
68th event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG
71st event percentile
Rebounding
4.8 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
76th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.2% TS
33rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 9th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 60.6 ORtg and 89.4 DRtg, producing a -28.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, creation, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Creation
1.6 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
6.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive efficiency
89.4 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-28.8 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
60.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
60.6
30th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
6.8 PPG
68th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
32.2%
33rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
27.7%
33rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
23.4%
28th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
19.0%
context4.2 attempts per game
Free throws
61.5%
67th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
27.7%
25th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.6 APG
71st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.4
18th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.0
54th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.4%
42nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
76th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
30.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-28.8
25th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-21.3
9th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
8.8
9th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
20.9
12th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.5%
46th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.8 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
127.2
context25.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#122
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
421.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
6.8
PPG
4.8
RPG
1.6
APG
#122
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#26
RANK
131
FIELD
81%
PERCENTILE
11.4
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
6.8
PPG
4.8
RPG
1.6
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
5
GP
11.4
PPG
8.2
RPG
1.8
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#122
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
11.4
PPG
8.2
RPG
1.8
APG
3.2
SPG
1.6
BPG
17%
3P%
36%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #122
//quick_read
6.8
PPG
4.8
RPG
1.6
APG
3.4
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.8
P68
Playmaking
1.6
P71
Rebounding
4.8
P66
True shooting
32%
P33
Two-way impact
-28.8
P25
Stops
57%
P42
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
23%
11 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
4 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
62%
8 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
34
PTS
6.8 / game
11–47
FGM–FGA
4–21
3PM–3PA
8–13
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
17
TOV
3.4 / game
0.47×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
24
REB
4.8 / game
7
OREB
17
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.4 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
3
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
8.8
HESI
20.9
PI
60.6
ORtg
89.4
DRtg
-28.8
NRtg
-21.3
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
28%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
3%
PIE
88.4
Team DRtg
-1.0
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
5 GP · event rank #26
//quick_read
11.4
PPG
8.2
RPG
1.8
APG
5.0
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.4
P88
Playmaking
1.8
P73
Rebounding
8.2
P85
True shooting
36%
P53
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
32%
24 made / 76 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
6 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
3 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
57
PTS
11.4 / game
24–76
FGM–FGA
6–36
3PM–3PA
3–9
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
25
TOV
5.0 / game
0.36×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
41
REB
8.2 / game
5
OREB
36
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
16
STL
3.2 / game
8
BLK
1.6 / game
12
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.