ORtg
98.1
88th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile6 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
2026-09-01
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #16 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
89.0
Event performance
89th event percentile
PI
82.7
Prospect index
89th event percentile
ORtg
98.1
Points / 100 poss.
88th event percentile
DRtg
74.0
Lower is better
57th event percentile
NRtg
+24.2
Two-way margin
87th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 98.1 · 88th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 74.0 · Stop% 81.5% · Team DRtg 83.1
Sample context
4 games · 127 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
89.0
89th event percentile
Prospect index
82.7
89th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
98.1
88th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.0
57th event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.2
87th event percentile
Stop percentage
81.5%
92nd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
12.3 PPG
89th event percentile
Creation
5.0 APG
97th event percentile
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
88th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.8 stocks
61st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.8% TS
90th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
5.0 APG · 97th event percentile
Event Efficiency
53% TS on 12.3 PPG · 90th event percentile
Scorer
12.3 PPG · 89th event percentile
Rebounder
7.5 RPG · 88th event percentile
Offensive Impact
98.1 ORtg · 88th event percentile
Event Impact
89.0 HESI performance · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 89th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 98.1 ORtg and 74.0 DRtg, producing a +24.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive stops, and scoring efficiency.
Creation
5.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
81.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Scoring efficiency
52.8% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
98.1
88th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
12.3 PPG
89th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.8%
90th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
52.4%
93rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
47.6%
90th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.7%
context3.8 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
45th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.8%
89th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.0 APG
97th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
74.0
57th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
83.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+9.1
96th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
81.5%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.8 STL+BLK
61st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
42.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+24.2
87th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+14.7
89th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
89.0
89th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
82.7
89th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.8%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.5 RPG
88th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
127.1
context31.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#16
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
412.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
12.3
PPG
7.5
RPG
5.0
APG
#16
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
12.3
PPG
7.5
RPG
5.0
APG
3.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.3
P89
Playmaking
5.0
P97
Rebounding
7.5
P88
True shooting
53%
P90
Two-way impact
+24.2
P87
Stops
82%
P92
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
20 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
49
PTS
12.3 / game
20–42
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
5.0 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
1.54×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
30
REB
7.5 / game
4
OREB
26
DREB
7.5
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
15
STL+BLK
3.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
89.0
HESI
82.7
PI
98.1
ORtg
74.0
DRtg
+24.2
NRtg
+14.7
Stable NRtg
82%
Stop%
46%
Floor%
52%
eFG%
14%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
+9.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
//current_rank
#16
of 138 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
12.3
PPG
7.5
RPG
5.0
APG
3.8
SPG
0.0
BPG
27%
3P%
53%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #16
//quick_read
12.3
PPG
7.5
RPG
5.0
APG
3.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.3
P89
Playmaking
5.0
P97
Rebounding
7.5
P88
True shooting
53%
P90
Two-way impact
+24.2
P87
Stops
82%
P92
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
20 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
49
PTS
12.3 / game
20–42
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
5.0 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
1.54×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
30
REB
7.5 / game
4
OREB
26
DREB
7.5
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
15
STL+BLK
3.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
89.0
HESI
82.7
PI
98.1
ORtg
74.0
DRtg
+24.2
NRtg
+14.7
Stable NRtg
82%
Stop%
46%
Floor%
52%
eFG%
14%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
+9.1
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.