ORtg
84.4
71st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Abdoul Karim Diallo
Forward · MLI · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
9.8 RPGRebounding · 97th event percentile
3.3 stocksDefensive activity · 84th event percentile
- 89.8
- HESI v2.1
- #14
- of 138
- 69%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #14 of 138 · Established
HESI
89.8
Event performance
89th event percentile
PI
84.5
Prospect index
90th event percentile
ORtg
84.4
Points / 100 poss.
71st event percentile
DRtg
60.1
Lower is better
92nd event percentile
NRtg
+24.3
Two-way margin
88th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 84.4 · 71st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 60.1 · Stop% 76.2% · Team DRtg 62.7
Sample context
6 games · 133 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
9.8 RPG97th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks84th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
89.8
89th event percentile
Prospect index
84.5
90th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
84.4
71st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
60.1
92nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.3
88th event percentile
Stop percentage
76.2%
86th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.0 PPG
74th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
9.8 RPG
97th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.2% TS
75th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Rebounder
9.8 RPG · 97th event percentile
- P97
Rim Protection
2.0 BPG · 97th event percentile
- P89
Defensive Impact
60.1 DRtg · 76% Stop% · 89th event percentile
- P89
Event Impact
89.8 HESI performance · 89th event percentile
- P88
Activity
9.8 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 89th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.4 ORtg and 60.1 DRtg, producing a +24.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Rebounding
9.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 92nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
60.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 88th event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.3 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.0 PPG
74th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.2%
75th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.2%
76th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
44.2%
86th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
43.5%
34th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.4%
84th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
60.1
92nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.5
79th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
76.2%
86th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
84th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
41.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+24.3
88th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+15.1
89th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
89.8
89th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
84.5
90th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.5%
87th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
9.8 RPG
97th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
133.2
context22.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#14
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Morocco U18 · 2026-09-25 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-25
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. Best current separators: Offensive rebounding, Finishing, Nail positioning, Post defense. Primary pressure points: Post play, Gap help.
Now · ForwardProjects · Forward
Translatable strengths
- · Offensive rebounding
- · Finishing
- · Nail positioning
- · Post defense
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Post play
- · Gap help
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Fits a connected help defense that values early positioning, tags and recoveries. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A low-communication scheme with unclear help and recovery responsibilities. Extended space assignments that consistently pull her away from the paint.
Development priorities
Post play · Gap help
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
LM D1
Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive89.8 performance rating · rank 14 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 84.4 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive43.4% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive76.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.0
PPG
9.8
RPG
1.2
APG
#14
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#14/138Event board →
6
GP
8.0
PPG
9.8
RPG
1.2
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #13Karl Wabo-DepouillyC · Cameroonrank_below · #15Ronny EwankePF · Cameroon
//current_rank
#14
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#12
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.0
PPG
9.8
RPG
1.2
APG
1.3
SPG
2.0
BPG
—
3P%
45%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #14
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
9.8
RPG
1.2
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P74
Playmaking
1.2
P58
Rebounding
9.8
P97
True shooting
45%
P75
Two-way impact
+24.3
P88
Stops
76%
P86
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
19 made / 43 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
10 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 43●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
19–43
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–23
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.39×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
59
REB
9.8 / game
33
OREB
26
DREB
9.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
12
BLK
2.0 / game
18
PF
20
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
89.8
HESI
84.5
PI
84.4
ORtg
60.1
DRtg
+24.3
NRtg
+15.1
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
9%
PIE
62.7
Team DRtg
+2.5
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.