Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Yania Valverde

MEX · b. 2009

//measurables

178 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 79th event percentile

4.9 RPGRebounding · 78th event percentile

19.4
HESI v2.1: #156
of 192: 73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #156 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

19.4

Event performance

20th event percentile

30.0

Prospect index

19th event percentile

ORtg

71.7

Points / 100 poss.

36th event percentile

DRtg

94.1

Lower is better

14th event percentile

NRtg

-22.3

Two-way margin

25th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 71.7 · 36th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 94.1 · Stop% 61.9% · Team DRtg 96.5

Sample context

7 games · 163 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks79th event percentile

Rebounding

4.9 RPG78th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

19.4

20th event percentile

Prospect index

30.0

19th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

71.7

36th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

94.1

14th event percentile

Two-way margin

-22.3

25th event percentile

Stop percentage

61.9%

66th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.9 PPG

75th event percentile

Creation

2.0 APG

73rd event percentile

Rebounding

4.9 RPG

78th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks

79th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

34.6% TS

32nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P79
Activity
4.9 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/G · 79th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 20th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.7 ORtg and 94.1 DRtg, producing a -22.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
79th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Rebounding
4.9 RPG
78th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
7.9 PPG
75th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
94.1 DRtg
14th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-22.3 NRtg
25th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
34.6% TS
32nd event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

71.7

36th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.9 PPG

75th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

34.6%

32nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

34.0%

39th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

33.3%

49th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

10.0%

context

1.4 attempts per game

Free throws

40.0%

21st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

35.6%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.0 APG

73rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

94.1

14th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

96.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+2.5

80th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

61.9%

66th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.0 STL+BLK

79th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

40.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-22.3

25th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-16.3

20th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

19.4

20th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

30.0

19th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.9%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.9 RPG

78th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

163.1

context

23.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#156

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

565.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7.9

PPG

4.9

RPG

2.0

APG

#156

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#156/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.9

PPG

4.9

RPG

2.0

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

35%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.9

P75

Playmaking

2.0

P73

Rebounding

4.9

P78

True shooting

35%

P32

Two-way impact

-22.3

P25

Stops

62%

P66

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

33%

25 made / 75 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

10%

1 made / 10 attempts

Free throws

40%

4 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

13% of attempts from three

●2PA 65●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.9 / game

25–75

FGM–FGA

1–10

3PM–3PA

4–10

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.0 / game

TOV

1.3 / game

1.56×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.9 / game

OREB

DREB

4.9

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.7 / game

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

19.4

HESI

30.0

71.7

ORtg

94.1

DRtg

-22.3

NRtg

-16.3

Stable NRtg

62%

Stop%

36%

Floor%

34%

eFG%

PIE

96.5

Team DRtg

+2.5

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #155Linda ThimmGER

//current_rank

#156

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #157Anezka MisikovaCZE

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7.9

PPG

4.9

RPG

2.0

APG

1.3

SPG

0.7

BPG

10%

3P%

35%

TS%

event_stats