Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Ahmed Mohamed Osama Mahmoud Bakry

EGY · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

3.3 APGCreation · 92nd event percentile

6.2 PPGScoring load · 61st event percentile

18.3
HESI v2.1: #115
of 138: 70%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #115 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

18.3

Event performance

18th event percentile

26.1

Prospect index

17th event percentile

ORtg

65.9

Points / 100 poss.

37th event percentile

DRtg

88.3

Lower is better

22nd event percentile

NRtg

-22.4

Two-way margin

29th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 65.9 · 37th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.3 · Stop% 53.4% · Team DRtg 85.6

Sample context

6 games · 138 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

3.3 APG92nd event percentile

Scoring load

6.2 PPG61st event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

18.3

18th event percentile

Prospect index

26.1

17th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

65.9

37th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.3

22nd event percentile

Two-way margin

-22.4

29th event percentile

Stop percentage

53.4%

28th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

6.2 PPG

61st event percentile

Creation

3.3 APG

92nd event percentile

Rebounding

3.5 RPG

47th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

44th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

36.2% TS

48th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P92
Creator
3.3 APG · 92nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 18th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 65.9 ORtg and 88.3 DRtg, producing a -22.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

Creation
3.3 APG
92nd event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
88.3 DRtg
22nd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
53.4% Stop%
28th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Two-way margin
-22.4 NRtg
29th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

65.9

37th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

6.2 PPG

61st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

36.2%

48th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

33.0%

47th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

31.8%

60th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

11.1%

context

1.5 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

45th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

32.5%

45th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.3 APG

92nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.3

22nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.8

44th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

53.4%

28th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

44th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-22.4

29th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-17.2

18th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

18.3

18th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

26.1

17th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.0%

46th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.5 RPG

47th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

137.7

context

22.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#115

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

497.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6.2

PPG

3.5

RPG

3.3

APG

#115

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#45

RANK

FIELD

36%

PERCENTILE

6.5

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#115/138Event board →

6.2

PPG

3.5

RPG

3.3

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#45/70Event board →

6.5

PPG

1.8

RPG

1.5

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #114Isaiah JohnNigeria

//current_rank

#115

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #116Fallou Mbacké ManéF · Senegal

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#113
Fanasina Mikaewan Andrianilana Miharisoa
Power Forward · Madagascar
0.0 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.3 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6.5

PPG

1.8

RPG

1.5

APG

1.3

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

36%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #115

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.2

PPG

3.5

RPG

3.3

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.2

P61

Playmaking

3.3

P92

Rebounding

3.5

P47

True shooting

36%

P48

Two-way impact

-22.4

P29

Stops

53%

P28

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

32%

14 made / 44 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

11%

1 made / 9 attempts

Free throws

50%

8 made / 16 attempts

Shot selection

20% of attempts from three

●2PA 35●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

6.2 / game

14–44

FGM–FGA

1–9

3PM–3PA

8–16

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.3 / game

TOV

3.8 / game

0.87×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.5 / game

OREB

DREB

3.5

REB/G

defense

STL

1.2 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

18.3

HESI

26.1

65.9

ORtg

88.3

DRtg

-22.4

NRtg

-17.2

Stable NRtg

53%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

PIE

85.6

Team DRtg

-2.8

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #45

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.5

PPG

1.8

RPG

1.5

APG

2.8

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.5

P56

Playmaking

1.5

P61

Rebounding

1.8

P22

True shooting

36%

P38

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

34%

11 made / 32 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

Free throws

30%

3 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

16% of attempts from three

●2PA 27●3PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

6.5 / game

11–32

FGM–FGA

1–5

3PM–3PA

3–10

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.5 / game

TOV

2.8 / game

0.55×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

1.8 / game

OREB

DREB

1.8

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

36%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.