ORtg
57.8
25th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Isaiah John
NGR · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.6 stocksDefensive activity · 81st event percentile
1.4 APGCreation · 66th event percentile
- 16.8
- HESI v2.1
- #114
- of 138
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #114 of 138 · Established
HESI
16.8
Event performance
17th event percentile
PI
26.1
Prospect index
18th event percentile
ORtg
57.8
Points / 100 poss.
25th event percentile
DRtg
81.8
Lower is better
40th event percentile
NRtg
-24.0
Two-way margin
27th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 57.8 · 25th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.8 · Stop% 61.4% · Team DRtg 81.6
Sample context
5 games · 118 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
2.6 stocks81st event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG66th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
16.8
17th event percentile
Prospect index
26.1
18th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
57.8
25th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.8
40th event percentile
Two-way margin
-24.0
27th event percentile
Stop percentage
61.4%
51st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.4 PPG
63rd event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
66th event percentile
Rebounding
3.2 RPG
43rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.6 stocks
81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
26.5% TS
20th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 17th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 57.8 ORtg and 81.8 DRtg, producing a -24.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity and creation. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 81st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.6 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 66th event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 20th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
26.5% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 25th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
57.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 27th event percentile
Two-way margin
-24.0 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.4 PPG
63rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
26.5%
20th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
17.3%
16th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
16.3%
16th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
6.3%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
57.7%
61st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.5%
32nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.4 APG
66th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.8
40th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.2
55th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
61.4%
51st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.6 STL+BLK
81st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-24.0
27th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.7
17th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
16.8
17th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
26.1
18th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-3.3%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.2 RPG
43rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
118.3
context23.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#114
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
435.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
6.4
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.4
APG
#114
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#11
RANK
33
FIELD
69%
PERCENTILE
10.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#114/138Event board →
5
GP
6.4
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.4
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#11/33Event board →
4
GP
10.8
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#112
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
10.8
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
0.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
43%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #114
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.4
PPG
3.2
RPG
1.4
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.4
P63
Playmaking
1.4
P66
Rebounding
3.2
P43
True shooting
27%
P20
Two-way impact
-24.0
P27
Stops
61%
P51
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
16%
8 made / 49 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
6%
1 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
15 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
●2PA 33●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
32
PTS
6.4 / game
8–49
FGM–FGA
1–16
3PM–3PA
15–26
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
15
TOV
3.0 / game
0.47×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
16
REB
3.2 / game
6
OREB
10
DREB
3.2
REB/G
defense
11
STL
2.2 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
11
PF
13
STL+BLK
2.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
16.8
HESI
26.1
PI
57.8
ORtg
81.8
DRtg
-24.0
NRtg
-17.7
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
17%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
-0.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026
4 GP · event rank #11
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P76
Playmaking
1.5
P74
Rebounding
3.8
P50
True shooting
43%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
16 made / 43 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
3 made / 22 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
8 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 22
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
43
PTS
10.8 / game
16–43
FGM–FGA
3–22
3PM–3PA
8–15
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.5 / game
6
TOV
1.5 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
10
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
41%
eFG%
3%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.