Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Hugo Victor Ngabonziza

RWA · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

182 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

3.0 APGCreation · 90th event percentile

11.0 PPGScoring load · 86th event percentile

17.5
HESI v2.1: #112
of 138: 72%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

3 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #112 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

17.5

Event performance

18th event percentile

26.7

Prospect index

19th event percentile

ORtg

66.0

Points / 100 poss.

38th event percentile

DRtg

88.1

Lower is better

23rd event percentile

NRtg

-22.2

Two-way margin

29th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 66.0 · 38th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.1 · Stop% 60.2% · Team DRtg 88.4

Sample context

5 games · 157 minutes · 72% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

3.0 APG90th event percentile

Scoring load

11.0 PPG86th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

17.5

18th event percentile

Prospect index

26.7

19th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

66.0

38th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.1

23rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-22.2

29th event percentile

Stop percentage

60.2%

47th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

11.0 PPG

86th event percentile

Creation

3.0 APG

90th event percentile

Rebounding

6.8 RPG

85th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.4 stocks

61st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

41.5% TS

65th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P90
Creator
3.0 APG · 90th event percentile
P86
Scorer
11.0 PPG · 86th event percentile
P85
Rebounder
6.8 RPG · 85th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 18th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 66.0 ORtg and 88.1 DRtg, producing a -22.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Creation
3.0 APG
90th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
86th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
6.8 RPG
85th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
88.1 DRtg
23rd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-22.2 NRtg
29th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
66.0 ORtg
38th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

66.0

38th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

11.0 PPG

86th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

41.5%

65th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

38.6%

66th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

35.1%

67th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

17.4%

context

4.6 attempts per game

Free throws

52.4%

52nd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

31.7%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.0 APG

90th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.1

23rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.2

61st event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

60.2%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.4 STL+BLK

61st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

39.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-22.2

29th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-17.5

18th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

17.5

18th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

26.7

19th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.1%

70th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.8 RPG

85th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

157.4

context

31.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

72.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#112

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

421.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

11.0

PPG

6.8

RPG

3.0

APG

#112

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#28

RANK

131

FIELD

79%

PERCENTILE

11.4

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#112/138Event board →

11.0

PPG

6.8

RPG

3.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#28/131Event board →

11.4

PPG

6.8

RPG

3.2

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#18/70Event board →

12.5

PPG

5.3

RPG

4.8

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #111Théodoric Cédric Mbore MbaC · Gabon

//current_rank

#112

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #113Fanasina Mikaewan Andrianilana MiharisoaPF · Madagascar

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#110
Charles Alexandre Mpome Moukouri Douala
Point Guard · Cameroon
0.8 PPG 1.3 RPG 0.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.

11.4

PPG

6.8

RPG

3.2

APG

3.0

SPG

1.0

BPG

23%

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #112

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.0

PPG

6.8

RPG

3.0

APG

5.8

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.0

P86

Playmaking

3.0

P90

Rebounding

6.8

P85

True shooting

42%

P65

Two-way impact

-22.2

P29

Stops

60%

P47

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

35%

20 made / 57 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

4 made / 23 attempts

Free throws

52%

11 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

40% of attempts from three

●2PA 34●3PA 23

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

11.0 / game

20–57

FGM–FGA

4–23

3PM–3PA

11–21

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.0 / game

TOV

5.8 / game

0.52×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

6.8 / game

OREB

DREB

6.8

REB/G

defense

STL

0.8 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

17.5

HESI

26.7

66.0

ORtg

88.1

DRtg

-22.2

NRtg

-17.5

Stable NRtg

60%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

39%

eFG%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

+0.2

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #18

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.5

PPG

5.3

RPG

4.8

APG

4.0

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.5

P89

Playmaking

4.8

P96

Rebounding

5.3

P71

True shooting

43%

P60

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

33%

14 made / 43 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

11%

1 made / 9 attempts

Free throws

62%

21 made / 34 attempts

Shot selection

21% of attempts from three

●2PA 34●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

12.5 / game

14–43

FGM–FGA

1–9

3PM–3PA

21–34

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

4.8 / game

TOV

4.0 / game

1.19×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

5.3 / game

OREB

DREB

5.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.8 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

34%

eFG%

PIE

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

5 GP · event rank #28

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.4

PPG

6.8

RPG

3.2

APG

6.2

TOV/G

1.4

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.4

P88

Playmaking

3.2

P88

Rebounding

6.8

P75

True shooting

39%

P69

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

17 made / 64 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

23%

7 made / 30 attempts

Free throws

70%

16 made / 23 attempts

Shot selection

47% of attempts from three

●2PA 34●3PA 30

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

11.4 / game

17–64

FGM–FGA

7–30

3PM–3PA

16–23

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.2 / game

TOV

6.2 / game

0.52×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

6.8 / game

OREB

DREB

6.8

REB/G

defense

STL

3.0 / game

BLK

1.0 / game

STL+BLK

4.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

32%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.