ORtg
69.8
41st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Théodoric Cédric Mbore Mba
Center · GAB · b. 2008
//measurables
200 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.4 stocksDefensive activity · 37th event percentile
28.6% TSScoring efficiency · 25th event percentile
- 19.7
- HESI v2.1
- #111
- of 138
- 39%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #111 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
19.7
Event performance
20th event percentile
PI
27.3
Prospect index
20th event percentile
ORtg
69.8
Points / 100 poss.
41st event percentile
DRtg
103.5
Lower is better
1st event percentile
NRtg
-33.7
Two-way margin
19th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 69.8 · 41st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 103.5 · Stop% 38.2% · Team DRtg 96.4
Sample context
5 games · 39 minutes · 39% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.6% TS25th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
19.7
20th event percentile
Prospect index
27.3
20th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.8
41st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.5
1st event percentile
Two-way margin
-33.7
19th event percentile
Stop percentage
38.2%
5th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
13th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
1.2 RPG
13th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks
37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.6% TS
25th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 20th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 69.8 ORtg and 103.5 DRtg, producing a -33.7 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and creation.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 1st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 5th event percentile
Defensive stops
38.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 6th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.8 PPG
13th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
28.6%
25th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
28.6%
34th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
28.6%
45th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Floor%
34.6%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
103.5
1st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-7.1
11th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
38.2%
5th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.4 STL+BLK
37th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
6.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-33.7
19th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-16.4
20th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
19.7
20th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
27.3
20th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.5%
34th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.2 RPG
13th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
38.5
context7.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
39.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#111
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
441.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.0
APG
#111
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#38
RANK
57
FIELD
34%
PERCENTILE
2.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#111/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.0
APG
0.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
29%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P13
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.2
P13
True shooting
29%
P25
Two-way impact
-33.7
P19
Stops
38%
P5
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
2–7
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.2 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.2 / game
4
OREB
2
DREB
1.2
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
1
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
19.7
HESI
27.3
PI
69.8
ORtg
103.5
DRtg
-33.7
NRtg
-16.4
Stable NRtg
38%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
1%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
-7.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#38/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.2
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P28
Playmaking
0.2
P16
Rebounding
4.8
P70
True shooting
31%
P31
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
6 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
2.0 / game
6–17
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–5
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
8
TOV
1.3 / game
0.13×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
29
REB
4.8 / game
12
OREB
17
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
10
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
35%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #110Charles Alexandre Mpome Moukouri DoualaPG · Cameroonrank_below · #112Hugo Victor NgabonzizaRwanda
//current_rank
#111
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#109
#110
#112
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
2.0
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.2
APG
0.3
SPG
0.2
BPG
—
3P%
31%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #111
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.0
APG
0.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
29%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P13
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.2
P13
True shooting
29%
P25
Two-way impact
-33.7
P19
Stops
38%
P5
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
2–7
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.2 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.2 / game
4
OREB
2
DREB
1.2
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
1
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
19.7
HESI
27.3
PI
69.8
ORtg
103.5
DRtg
-33.7
NRtg
-16.4
Stable NRtg
38%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
29%
eFG%
1%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
-7.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #38
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.2
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P28
Playmaking
0.2
P16
Rebounding
4.8
P70
True shooting
31%
P31
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
6 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
2.0 / game
6–17
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–5
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
8
TOV
1.3 / game
0.13×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
29
REB
4.8 / game
12
OREB
17
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
10
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
35%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.